From Solo to Team Collaboration
Individual AI agents have their limits—they may excel at planning but not execution, or coding but not testing. This is like one person cannot simultaneously be a top architect, programmer, and test engineer. Multi-Agent Collaboration is designed to solve this problem: breaking complex tasks into subtasks, each handled by an agent with specific expertise, and achieving overall goals through collaboration.
The core idea of multi-agent collaboration draws from human team dynamics: someone handles planning and decomposition (project manager), someone executes (engineer), someone ensures quality (reviewer). Each agent focuses on its domain, exchanging information through standardized communication protocols, and ultimately delivering high-quality results.
Three Modes of Multi-Agent Collaboration
1. Sequential Pipeline: Agents execute in a fixed order, with each agent's output serving as the next agent's input. Suitable for tasks with clear processes, such as document processing pipelines.
2. Hierarchical: A "manager" agent handles task allocation and result aggregation, while multiple "worker" agents work in parallel. Suitable for tasks that can be decomposed for parallel execution.
3. Debate: Multiple agents independently generate solutions, then review and debate each other's proposals to reach consensus. Suitable for decision-making tasks requiring multi-perspective analysis.
This article focuses on the hierarchical mode, which is also the mode adopted by the "Multi-Agent Collaboration Chain" skill chain.
Skill Chain Breakdown: Multi-Agent Collaboration Chain
We use the "Multi-Agent Collaboration Chain" as an example to illustrate the node orchestration of the hierarchical mode:
Node 1: Task Planning (sp-188)—The "Planner" agent receives user requirements, decomposes complex tasks into executable subtasks, and assigns them to appropriate executors. The quality of this node directly determines the efficiency of the entire collaboration chain.
Node 2: Code Execution (sp-187)—The "Executor" agent completes coding tasks based on the planner's assignments. Multiple executors can work in parallel, each responsible for different modules.
Node 3: Quality Review (sp-195)—The "Reviewer" agent checks the quality of the executors' outputs. The reviewer must be independent of the executors and evaluate code quality, logical correctness, and security against objective standards.
Node 4: Result Aggregation (sp-122)—The planner intervenes again, collecting all executors' outputs and reviewers' feedback, and integrating them into the final deliverable. If the review fails, the planner reassigns tasks back to the execution node.
Practical Implementation: Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework
The following code demonstrates the implementation of hierarchical multi-agent collaboration:
import json from openai import OpenAI from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor client = OpenAI( api_key="your-deepseek-api-key", base_url="https://api.deepseek.com" ) class AgentRole: """Define agent role""" def __init__(self, name, system_prompt): self.name = name self.system_prompt = system_prompt def execute(self, task): response = client.chat.completions.create( model="deepseek-chat", messages=[ {"role": "system", "content": self.system_prompt}, {"role": "user", "content": task} ] ) return response.choices[0].message.content # Define roles PLANNER = AgentRole("Planner", """You are a senior technical architect. Your responsibilities: 1. Analyze user requirements and decompose them into 2-4 parallel executable subtasks 2. Specify the executor type for each subtask (frontend/backend/test/documentation) 3. Define dependencies between subtasks Output format (JSON): { "subtasks": [ {"id": 1, "type": "type", "description": "task description", "depends_on": []} ] }""") EXECUTOR = AgentRole("Executor", """You are a full-stack development engineer. Based on the task description, produce high-quality code implementation. Include: 1. Complete code implementation 2. Key design decisions explanation 3. Potential risks""") REVIEWER = AgentRole("Reviewer", """You are a strict code review expert. Review criteria: 1. Code correctness (logical errors) 2. Security (injection, leakage risks) 3. Performance (obvious bottlenecks) 4. Maintainability (code clarity) Output format (JSON): { "approved": true/false, "score": 0-100, "issues": ["issue description"], "suggestions": ["improvement suggestions"] }""") class MultiAgentSystem: def __init__(self, max_iterations=5): self.max_iterations = max_iterations def run(self, user_request): print(f"User request: {user_request}\n") # Phase 1: Planning print("=== Phase 1: Task Planning ===") plan = PLANNER.execute(f"Please create an execution plan for the following request:\n{user_request}") subtasks = json.loads(plan)["subtasks"] print(f"Decomposed into {len(subtasks)} subtasks\n") # Phase 2: Parallel Execution print("=== Phase 2: Parallel Execution ===") results = {} with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=4) as executor: futures = {} for task in subtasks: future = executor.submit( EXECUTOR.execute, f"Subtask {task['id']}：{task['description']}" ) futures[future] = task['id'] for future in futures: task_id = futures[future] results[task_id] = future.result() print(f"Subtask {task_id} execution completed") # Phase 3: Review print("\n=== Phase 3: Quality Review ===") all_approved = True for task_id, result in results.items(): review = REVIEWER.execute(f"Please review the following code:\n{result}") review_data = json.loads(review) status = "✓ Passed" if review_data["approved"] else "✗ Needs modification" print(f"Subtask {task_id}: {status} (Score: {review_data['score']})") if not review_data["approved"]: all_approved = False # Phase 4: Summary print("\n=== Phase 4: Result Summary ===") summary_prompt = f"""Please summarize the results of the multi-agent collaboration: Original requirement: {user_request} Subtask execution results: {json.dumps(results, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2)} Please generate a final delivery report, including: 1. Project overview 2. Module descriptions 3. Integration plan 4. Considerations""" final_report = PLANNER.execute(summary_prompt) return final_report # Usage example system = MultiAgentSystem(max_iterations=5) report = system.run("Develop a simple todo web application supporting CRUD and status marking") print(f"\nFinal report:\n{report}") re> Challenges and Countermeasures for Multi-Agent Collaboration
Communication Overhead: Information transfer between agents incurs significant token consumption. Solutions: Use structured communication protocols (e.g., JSON Schema) to reduce redundant information; summarize and compress intermediate results.
Consistency Issues: Different agents may produce conflicting outputs. Solutions: Set clear interface contracts defining input/output formats for each agent; introduce an "arbitrator" role to resolve conflicts.
Error Propagation: Errors from upstream agents can propagate downstream. Solutions: Add validation steps at each node; if review fails, roll back to the previous node and re-execute.
Cost Control: Token consumption in multi-agent collaboration is several times that of a single agent. Solutions: Dynamically select the number of agents based on task complexity; use a single agent for simple tasks, and enable multi-agent only for complex tasks.
The Future of Multi-Agent Collaboration
As AI capabilities improve, multi-agent collaboration is moving from experimentation to production. Future agent teams will be more flexible—agents can dynamically join or leave, automatically adjusting team size based on task requirements. Agents may even "hire" each other, forming decentralized AI collaboration networks. Mastering multi-agent collaboration means mastering the core competitiveness of future AI application development.
Want to orchestrate this skill chain yourself?
Open in Skill Chain →