contract-review

name contract-review description 律师助理与法律助手、项目管理专家在审核合同、排查条款风险时必备。自动执行基础、商业、法律三层审查，仅添加批注不改原文，一键生成带批注合同、审查摘要、综合意见及业务流程图，让合同风控与业务梳理更高效专业。 Contract Review Skill Overview This skill performs contract reviews by adding comments only (no edits to the original text). It follows a three-layer review (basic, business, legal) and generates: Annotated contract (.docx) Contract summary (.docx) Consolidated review opinion (.docx) Business flowchart (Mermaid + rendered image) Language rule: detect the contract’s dominant language and output all generated content (comments, summary, opinion, flowchart text) in that language. Use the guidance in references/language.md . Workflow Unpack the contract (.docx) for XML operations Read contract text (pandoc or XML) Execute three-layer review Add comments to the document Generate contract summary Generate consolidated opinion Generate business flowchart and render image Repack to .docx Output Naming Output directory: 审核结果：{ContractName} for Chinese or Review_Result_{ContractName} for English Reviewed contract: {ContractName}_审核版.docx for Chinese or {ContractName}_Reviewed.docx for English Review report: 审核报告.txt for Chinese or Review_Report.txt for English Comment Principles Comments only : do not modify the original text or formatting Precise anchoring : comment should target specific clauses/paragraphs Structured content : each comment includes issue type, risk reason, and revision suggestion Risk level : carried by reviewer name; do not include a “risk level” line in comment body Output language : use labels in the contract’s language (see references/language.md ) Comment example (English): [Issue Type] Payment Terms [Risk Reason] The total amount is stated as USD 100,000 in Section 3.2, but the payment clause lists USD 1,000,000 in Section 5.1. This inconsistency may cause disputes. [Revision Suggestion] Align the total amount across clauses and clarify whether tax is included. Review Standards Use the three-layer review model and the detailed checklist in references/checklist.md . Layer 1: Basic (text quality) Accuracy of numbers, dates, terms Consistent numbering and references Clarity and lack of ambiguity Formatting and punctuation quality Layer 2: Business terms Scope, deliverables, quantity/specs Pricing and payment schedule Delivery/acceptance procedures Rights/obligations and performance guarantees Layer 3: Legal terms Effectiveness and term/termination Liability/penalties and remedies Dispute resolution and governing law Confidentiality, force majeure, IP, notice, authorization Risk levels (encoded in reviewer name): 🔴 High: core business ambiguity (price, scope, rights/obligations) 🟡 Medium: material but non-core ambiguity 🔵 Low: minimal practical impact Contract Summary Generate a structured, objective summary in the contract’s language. See references/summary.md (English template) Use references/language.md for language selection and Chinese labels Output file: 合同概要.docx for Chinese or Contract_Summary.docx for English (default font: 仿宋; adjust if language requires) Consolidated Opinion Generate a concise, two-paragraph response for the business team in the contract’s language. See references/opinion.md Output file: 综合审核意见.docx for Chinese or Consolidated_Opinion.docx for English (default font: 仿宋; adjust if language requires) Business Flowchart (Mermaid) Generate Mermaid flowchart per requirements and render to image. See references/flowchart.md Outputs: business_flowchart.mmd business_flowchart.png li## Technical Notes Core workflow: Unpack → 2. Add comments → 3. Summary → 4. Opinion → 5. Flowchart → 6. Repack API & implementation details: references/technical.md Dependencies Python 3.9+ (3.10+ recommended) pandoc (system install) defusedxml Mermaid CLI ( mmdc ) for rendering python-docx for rich text output Troubleshooting (Short) Comments missing in Word : run doc.verify_comments() and re-save find_paragraph fails : shorten search text; confirm actual paragraph text Mermaid render fails : ensure mmdc installed; use Chrome path or Puppeteer config Examples See references/examples.md for a full workflow example. Important Rules Never alter original contract text Review all three layers, do not skip items Ensure risk level is accurate and consistent Keep comments precise, professional, and actionable Flowchart must come strictly from the contract text Summary is objective only; no risk analysis Opinion only reflects findings already identified