mfg-oee-analysis
Calculate and diagnose Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) by decomposing into Availability, Performance, and Quality rates. Use this skill when the user needs to measure production line efficiency, identify equipment losses, benchmark manufacturing performance, or justify capital investment — even if they say 'why is our output low', 'machine utilization report', 'production efficiency', or 'how much capacity are we losing'.
DeepseekModel
Curated skill
Quality Excellent · 78
v1.0.0
Get
https://deepseekmodel.com/api/download.php?id=asgard-ai-platform-skills-mfg-oee-analysis-skill-md&format=skill
Download .skill
Standard format with system_prompt and model_config, ready for any agent framework
The actual content of the system_prompt field in the .skill file.
name mfg-oee-analysis description Calculate and diagnose Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) by decomposing into Availability, Performance, and Quality rates. Use this skill when the user needs to measure production line efficiency, identify equipment losses, benchmark manufacturing performance, or justify capital investment — even if they say 'why is our output low', 'machine utilization report', 'production efficiency', or 'how much capacity are we losing'. metadata {"category":"WP-03 製造業","tags":["manufacturing","oee","production-efficiency"]} OEE Analysis Framework IRON LAW: OEE = Availability × Performance × Quality OEE is a MULTIPLICATIVE metric. 90% × 90% × 90% = 72.9%, not 90%. Each factor compounds the loss. World-class OEE is 85%+. Most plants operate at 60-65%. Knowing the TOTAL is useless — you must decompose to find which factor is dragging performance down. The Three Factors Factor Formula Measures Loss Categories Availability Run Time / Planned Production Time Uptime vs downtime Equipment failures, changeovers, material shortages Performance (Ideal Cycle Time × Total Count) / Run Time Actual speed vs design speed Minor stops, slow running, idling Quality Good Count / Total Count Yield, first-pass quality Defects, rework, scrap, startup rejects Six Big Losses (mapped to OEE factors) Loss OEE Factor Example 1. Equipment failure Availability Machine breakdown, unplanned repair 2. Setup & changeover Availability Product changeover, die change, cleaning 3. Idling & minor stops Performance Sensor blockage, jam clearing, small adjustments 4. Reduced speed Performance Running below rated speed due to wear or material 5. Process defects Quality In-process rejects, rework 6. Startup rejects Quality Scrap during warm-up, first-article failures Calculation Example Planned Production Time: 480 min (8-hour shift) Downtime (breakdowns + changeover): 60 min Run Time: 420 min Ideal Cycle Time: 1 min/unit Total Units Produced: 380 Good Units: 360 Defective Units: 20 Availability = 420 / 480 = 87.5% Performance = (1 × 380) / 420 = 90.5% Quality = 360 / 380 = 94.7% OEE = 87.5% × 90.5% × 94.7% = 75.0% Diagnosis Steps Phase 1: Calculate OEE for each production line/machine Phase 2: Identify the weakest factor (Availability, Performance, or Quality) Phase 3: Pareto the losses within that factor (which specific loss is biggest?) Phase 4: Root cause analysis on the top loss (5 Whys, fishbone) Phase 5: Improve and remeasure Benchmarks OEE Level Rating Typical > 85% World-class Top manufacturers 60-85% Typical Room for improvement 40-60% Low Significant losses, urgent action needed < 40% Critical Equipment or process fundamentally broken Output Format # OEE Report: {Production Line} ## OEE Summary | Factor | Value | Benchmark | Status | |--------|-------|-----------|--------| | Availability | {%} | >90% | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | | Performance | {%} | >95% | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | | Quality | {%} | >99% | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | | **OEE** | **{%}** | **>85%** | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | ## Loss Breakdown | Loss | Minutes Lost | % of Total Loss | Priority | |------|-------------|----------------|---------| | {loss type} | {min} | {%} | 1/2/3 | ## Root Cause (Top Loss) {5 Whys or fishbone analysis} ## Improvement Plan | Action | Target Impact | Timeline | Owner | |--------|-------------|----------|-------| | {action} | +{X%} OEE | {weeks} | {who} | Gotchas OEE is per machine, not per plant : Plant-level OEE averages hide that one machine at 95% and another at 45% average to 70%. Analyze individually. Planned downtime is excluded : OEE measures losses against PLANNED production time. Scheduled maintenance, no-production shifts, and planned shutdowns are excluded from the denominator. 100% OEE is not the goal : It would mean zero changeovers, zero defects, running at max speed 100% of the time. Pursuing 100% can increase costs (e.g., never doing preventive maintenance). Target 85%+ for critical lines. Data collection is the real challenge : Manual OEE tracking is inaccurate. Invest in automated data collection (sensors, MES integration) for reliable measurement. References For TPM (Total Productive Maintenance) methodology, see references/tpm.md For automated OEE data collection, see references/oee-automation.md
Keywords that activate this skill. Click one to copy it.
This skill does not provide trigger words.
The downloaded .skill package contains the following fields.
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| format | Format tag (skill/v1) |
| skill_id | Unique skill ID |
| name | Skill name |
| version | Version |
| description | Description |
| category | Categories (array) |
| trigger_words | Trigger words |
| tags | Tags |
| source | Source |
| source_url | Source URL (this page) |
| exported_at | Exported at (set per download) |
| system_prompt | System prompt body |
| model_config | Model config: provider / model / temperature / max_tokens / top_p |
| examples | Examples |
| install_guide | Import guide for Coze / Dify / Claude / custom frameworks |
The same skill can be exported in different platform formats.