acceptance

name acceptance version 0.4.0 description End-to-end verification and self-evidence for a delivery in any repository, with or without a preconfigured verify plan. Discover an existing plan when one was handed to this run; otherwise author checks and publish a standalone acceptance. Pick the proving surface (CLI / web / desktop / iOS Simulator), drive the real product, capture visually confirmed evidence, and publish a round with the lh CLI. Triggers on 'verify the task', 'collect evidence', 'prove it works', 'upload evidence', 'verify plan', 'requiredEvidence', 'local test', 'manual test', 'test report', 'test with cli', 'test in electron', 'test desktop', or any local end-to-end verification task. Needs no ambient ids, and never depends on running inside a LobeHub conversation. Acceptance (Builder Self-Evidence) You are the builder for a delivery. A separate review step judges it against a plan — checks you author, or a verify plan handed to this run. A check that declares requiredEvidence cannot pass on your text alone : a missing artifact marks it uncertain and holds the delivery. author (or discover) the plan → pick the surface → capture evidence → publish the round → self-check coverage Independent tester review The primary checks the environment, writes the plan, executes cases, inspects evidence, repairs failures, and publishes. Use one tester agent at two points: review requirement coverage before execution, then independently inspect the completed evidence before declaring acceptance complete. Reuse the tester when the host supports it; do not delegate execution or require per-case approval. Read tester-review.md for the input/output contract, review boundaries, and repair follow-up. Tester review supplements the primary's own checks and any configured verifier; it does not replace either. If delegation or required media inspection is unavailable, disclose the missing review and unverified claims rather than claiming independent acceptance. Read the project layer first Before touching an environment, check for .agents/acceptance/ : File What it owns PROJECT.md Start/stop commands, ports, services, auth, surfaces, probes PROCESS.md The run process: approval gate, execution rules, teardown common-mistakes.md Project living log — what earlier rounds got wrong here probe-mock-patterns.md Project living log — how to force state on this product The project layer owns how this repository is run ; this skill owns what a valid round is (plan, evidence, report, immutable round, the hard rule). On running, the project layer wins; on what may be published, this skill wins. Never invent a start command, port, or auth flow PROJECT.md answers; fix a divergence in the adapter during the run instead of working around it. No .agents/acceptance/ → bootstrap one first: project-adapter.md . Living logs — inject each by its own shape Both layers (this skill's generic copies and the project's own) are loaded once the target is known, silently: common-mistakes.md — read its Checklist in full, now and again before marking any case pass . Pull an entry by id only when a checklist line applies to a case. probe-mock-patterns.md — read the heading index, then pull only the entries this round needs. Pick by meaning, not keyword; rg over the body is the fallback. rg -n '^#{2,4} ' <file> # the index, with line numbers sed -n '<start>,<end>p' <file> # one entry, in full Record new project-specific learnings in the project layer only. Two paths — no id is required Every evidence command targets a round. The authored path is the default ; you have an operation id only when the invocation names one. Never hunt the environment for one, and never report this skill inapplicable — a round without an operation is simply recorded as standalone . You have Path No plan — you author the checks Write result.json + assets/ , publish with lh acceptance run ingest — report.md An operation id you were given lh verify plan state , then result submit --operation per criterion — plan-format.md Pass --subject ( task:<id> / topic:<id> / document:<id> ) only when the caller named one; otherwise ingest attaches the round itself when it can and creates a standalone acceptance when it cannot. On the first ingest, always supply --requirement "<one-sentence business goal>" — the durable goal of the whole acceptance, not this round's scope; it is immutable once recorded. Prerequisites: lh is authed ( lh acceptance run list --json returns [] or data; an auth error means stop and surface it), and only the UI driver the selected surface needs is installed — probe before adding dependencies, and never substitute a private agent plugin. HARD RULE — programmatic gates are NEVER acceptance checks Every check MUST be an outcome a person decides about the delivery : what the user sees, hears, reads, or receives. These MUST NOT appear as a check, under any phrasing: unit / integration / regression / snapshot tests, coverage, type-check / tsc , lint / eslint , format, "compiles", "build passes", "CI is green". Run them, then report them as one line of narrative . Enforced at ingest: every matching item (matched on title, category, AND method — "run bun run test " under a product-sounding title still matches) is dropped with a warning and summary recounted; a round of only such checks fails to publish . The line is the subject of the check, not who judged it: a CLI behavior asserted by a command is a fine check ( verifier: "program" ); "the suite is green" is not. Before writing any plan, ask of each draft check: would the user click accept/reject on this? Rounds are immutable — repair means a NEW round A published round is a permanent record. Never re-submit into a round after changing the code — publish the re-verification as the next round and let the acceptance page show the progression. Before a repair round, read the aggregate with lh acceptance view <acceptanceId | type:id> --json . Omit checks whose latest userReview.action is accept ; address non-stale rejects under their exact stable ids; when a check semantically replaces another, declare supersedes: ['old-id'] and repeat the full lineage in every later round that reuses the successor id. Pass --acceptance <acceptanceId> so the round joins the same history. Rules you will be tempted to skip Not judgment calls — the moves an agent under pressure makes and must not. Each excuse below was made in a real round. Excuse Reality "Injection is hard; happy-path plus unit tests covers it" The error state was the goal. Walk the probe ladder ( probe-mock-patterns.md A) before calling it blocked. (M2) "The branch name says what to verify" / "Loading the living logs first…" The task lives in the user's words. Recover it, or confirm a labeled guess with one structured question — silently; never narrate setup. (M3, M21) "The black frame is probably display sleep / a permission" Measure first: pixel brightness, the permission bit, an A/B with one variable toggled. Publish "confirmed by X" or "suspected", never a guess. (M4) "Let me ask how they want it run" / "I'll click Sign in and you authorize" / "too small to screenshot" Environment mechanics are yours: full isolated run, auth by direct injection (never an interactive login — it hijacks the user's browser), a screenshot for every user-facing change. Ask only about the product decision. (M8) "One more config edit and the env will boot" / "I'll mock it" / "I'll drive the rest myself" Timebox. Inventory running instances, probe for the real capability before mocking (a mock that records nothing is not in the path), re-delegate a dead subagent's remaining steps, revert experiments and ask. (M17) "The fix is in and tests pass — verified" Reproduce the failure's precondition first, then verify with it held. A run that cannot fail proves nothing; "reproduces sometimes" means an unnamed precondition. When the mocked seam is the suspect, drop the mock. (M31) Pick the surface by what you changed Match the change to the cheapest surface that can prove it; escalate only if needed. What your task changed Surface Guide Backend / CLI / library / data logic CLI — stdout as text , zero UI flakiness surfaces/cli.md Web app frontend / styles / interactions Web (agent-browser → running web app) surfaces/web.md New/changed API plus the UI consuming it Web , full-stack (agent-browser + network capture) surfaces/web.md Desktop-only behavior (native windows, IPC, packaged shell) Electron (agent-browser --cdp ) surfaces/electron.md Native macOS app / OS chrome agent-browser can't reach Native (osascript + screencapture, local macOS) surfaces/native.md Native iOS behavior, gestures, device-size layout iOS Simulator (AXe/native CLI + simctl ) surfaces/ios-simulator.md Don't open a browser for a backend change ; command output as text is the strongest, cheapest proof. Use Electron only when the criterion depends on desktop-only code; iOS is driven by a Simulator HID/AX CLI, never host mouse — mark the case blocked if the CLI cannot express the gesture. Structured data uses native visualizations ( cases[].datasets + cases[].visualizations ; raw CSV/JSON stays as evidence ), not a PNG — report.md . A deliverable the user hears needs audio — evidence.md . Auth is a gate scoped to the surface : authenticate that surface first or every capture lands on the sign-in page. Web: auth-web.md . A UI round may price its interaction cost by recording KLM operator counts into interaction-trace.jsonl ; optional, never hand-written — interaction-cost.md . Shared rules for every artifact — media types, provenance, file vs inline, safety — are in evidence.md . Final handoff (mandatory) Before declaring the task done, prove coverage: for each check with requiredEvidence , every declared type is present at least once. Report it explicitly; a missing type holds the delivery at uncertain no matter how good the work is. The final response MUST include the published acceptance URL together with the coverage result — never only a check-result id or a prose claim. Expose only the acceptance ( /acceptance/<acceptanceId> ), the stable cross-round decision surface; append ?r=<roundIndex> for this round's fixed snapshot. Put no images, local paths, local file links, or internal run-page paths in the chat reply. Acceptance: https://app.lobehub.com/acceptance/<acceptanceId> Coverage: 2/2 criteria, all required evidence uploaded Portability rules Engine-level capture over OS capture. agent-browser screenshot / dom / eval run headless; screencapture / osascript are macOS-only. iOS: xcrun simctl io over host-window capture. Rounds land under .acceptances/ , which the CLI keeps out of git. Upload as you go. Evidence keyed to its check mid-run survives a crash near the end. Don't invent evidence. Capture only the types a check declares. Reference map For both tester handoffs and review output, read tester-review.md . | Need | Reference |