research-and-synthesis

name research-and-synthesis description Fetch and summarize authoritative external sources into actionable guidance using MCP helpers. EXCLUSIVE to researcher agent. allowed-tools Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, WebFetch, mcp_gemini-bridge, mcp_context7, mcp_web-search-prime, mcp_web-reader, mcp_zread Research and Synthesis Exclusive to: researcher agent MCP Helpers (Brain + Memory + Web) 🧠 Gemini-Bridge (Brain) — Deep Analysis mcp_gemini-bridge_consult_gemini( query="Research [topic] with pros/cons, security considerations, and code examples", directory="." ) 📚 Context7 (Memory) — Up-to-Date Docs # Resolve library first mcp_context7_resolve-library-id(libraryName="fastapi", query="dependency injection") # Then query mcp_context7_query-docs(libraryId="/tiangolo/fastapi", query="Depends pattern") 🌐 Web Search Tools — Live Research # Discover relevant content mcp_web-search-prime_search(query="[topic] best practices 2025") # Read full articles mcp_web-reader_read(url="https://discovered-url.com/article") # Smart content extraction mcp_zread_read(url="https://docs-page.com") Research Flow: Search with web-search-prime to find sources Read promising articles with web-reader or zread Verify with Context7 official docs Synthesize with Gemini-Bridge ## Instructions 1. Understand project stack from `docs/project-overview-pdr.md` 2. Define the research question clearly 3. Use **Gemini-Bridge** for deep analysis and reasoning 4. Use **Context7** for up-to-date library documentation 5. Verify with multiple sources 6. Summarize actionable findings ## Supported Stacks **PHP/Laravel:** - Laravel 12, Inertia.js, Pest **JavaScript/React:** - React 19, TypeScript, Tailwind, shadcn/ui **Python:** - FastAPI, LangChain, LangGraph, pytest, Pydantic ## Source Evaluation | Criteria | ✅ Good | ❌ Bad | |----------|---------|--------| | Recency | < 1 year | > 2 years | | Authority | Official docs | Random blogs | | Relevance | Same stack | Different framework | ## Research Process 1. Define the question clearly 2. Fetch 1-3 authoritative sources 3. Verify with multiple sources 4. Summarize actionable findings ## Package Evaluation | Factor | Check | |--------|-------| | Maintenance | Last commit < 6 months | | Compatibility | Works with Laravel 12 / React 19 | | Documentation | Clear docs, examples | | Security | No known vulnerabilities | ## Comparison Matrix ```markdown | Criteria | Option A | Option B | |----------|----------|----------| | Implementation | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | | Performance | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | | Security | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | Output Template ## Summary [2-3 sentences] ## Key Findings - Finding 1 - Finding 2 ## Recommendation [Which option and why] ## References - [ Source ]( url ) Examples "Confirm best practice for Laravel validation" "Compare package A vs package B"