Skills Plugins MCP Prompt Model 博客 我的中心

paper-search-pro

$48

DeepseekModel Curated skill Quality Excellent · 78 v1.0.0

Get

https://deepseekmodel.com/api/download.php?id=o0000-code-paper-search-pro-skill-md&format=skill
Download .skill Standard format with system_prompt and model_config, ready for any agent framework
The actual content of the system_prompt field in the .skill file.
name paper-search-pro description Find academic papers across up to 7 sources (OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / CrossRef / PubMed / arXiv for English, plus native-Chinese retrieval via NSSD 国家哲社文献中心 + yiigle 中华医学期刊) with adjustable depth — Quick scan (5 min) to Audit prep (3 hr). Use when the user wants to find papers, run a literature search, gather references, scope a research topic, search Chinese-language / 中文原生 literature (中文文献/中文核心/CSSCI/C刊/国内研究/国内文献/中华××期刊/心理学报/经济研究), or filter results by journal tier (中科院分区/一区/几区, Q1, JCR/SJR quartile, 影响因子/impact factor, 期刊分区, 顶刊/top journal, '按分区筛'). Triggers on search verbs ('find papers', 'literature search', 'papers about X'), review types ('scoping review', 'systematic review', 'SR prep', 'literature review', 'lit review', 'help me write a lit review'), Chinese ('找文献', '找论文', '论文搜索', '学术检索', '文献检索', '文献综述', '综述前期', '求文献', '中文文献', '中文核心', 'CSSCI', 'C刊', '国内研究', '找中文的'). Outputs Shadcn HTML report + BibTeX/RIS/CSV + PRISMA-S log. Do NOT use for: concept explanations ('what is X' / 'X 是什么', e.g. '影响因子怎么算'), writing ('帮我写' / 'help me write a paragraph'), single-paper interpretation or PDF download with metadata (use paper-downloader-portable), or when the user already has a literature set (use literature-set-review). license Apache-2.0 allowed-tools Bash, Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Task metadata {"author":"Bo","version":"2.3.0","vendored-from":"futurehouse/paper-qa (Apache 2.0)"} paper-search-pro Multi-source literature search with adjustable depth. Four tiers, five data sources orchestrated by you (the main agent). Python helpers handle deterministic work; LLM classification is delegated to parallel Inline SubAgents — no external API key required. When to use this skill User wants to find academic papers / 找文献 / 论文搜索 User is preparing a literature review, systematic review (SR), scoping review, or meta-analysis User wants to scope research on a topic for a thesis / proposal / coursework / news story User asks "what research exists on X" / "find me papers about Y" User uploads a query that suggests literature gathering (PICO, SPIDER, MeSH, RCT, etc.) When NOT to use User wants to read a specific paper (use PDF reader / download tool) User wants to summarize a single known paper (use a summarizer) User wants to download PDFs given DOIs (use paper-downloader-portable ) User already has a literature set and wants to write a review (use literature-set-review / factor-outcome-review ) User wants concept explanation, not papers ("what is prospect theory" → just answer) 🤖 Called by another agent / headless mode If you are an agent driving this Skill for your own reasoning (not for a human who wants an HTML report) , do NOT hand-run the 14-STEP recipe below. There is a single structured-data channel built for you: PYTHONPATH= $PSP_HOME python3 -m scripts.agent_search "<query>" > result.json One command runs the whole deterministic core — multi-strategy retrieve → dedup → heuristic relevance score (computed for every paper) → saturation signal → quota snapshot → per-paper journal metric — and prints one JSON envelope (no HTML, no PRISMA, no LLM classification SubAgent). The human path below is unaffected. That command gives you a deterministic floor , not the finished job — agent mode is not meant to stop at the machine output; references/agent_mode.md is where you layer your own semantic judgement on top to reach human-recipe quality (the command guarantees the floor; you supply the quality). 📖 Read references/agent_mode.md for the full envelope schema, every flag ( --verify , --min-relevance , --quartile , --min-impact , …), the relevance formula, error codes / exit codes, and source selection. This is the SSOT for agent callers — everything else in this section is just the pointer to it. Everything from here down is the human-facing 14-STEP recipe (HTML report + exports). Use it when the consumer is a person. 🔥 Execution discipline (read before running anything) Four invariants govern every step — ignoring them is the dominant failure mode in real sessions: A — NEVER cd into the Skill directory. cd $PSP_HOME rebinds ./ to the Skill asset folder, so ./paper-search-results/... lands inside the Skill instead of the user's workspace (and a re-install wipes it). Run every helper from the user's PWD: PYTHONPATH=$PSP_HOME python3 -m scripts.<name> … > "$SEARCH_DIR/..." . $PSP_HOME (STEP 0) is the install dir; $SEARCH_DIR (STEP 0) is an absolute path under the user's PWD. B — Dispatch classifier SubAgents in parallel. STEP 6 puts up to 5 Task blocks in one assistant message; serial dispatch inflates Standard tier from ~10 to ~17 min. The worked example lives in STEP 6 — it is not repeated elsewhere. C — Announce every skip. If you skip a STEP (budget / empty data / user choice), say what you skipped, why , what's lost , and how to recover (e.g. "re-run at --tier deep "). Skipping is fine; surprising the user is not. D — Read a step's cited reference when that step is non-trivial for this case. Each STEP names a references/<file>.md carrying edge cases not duplicated here. You won't read all of them every run, nor should you — but skipping the reference for a step you are actually about to run is where boundary knowledge (dict-vs-list shapes, enrich-not-search, DOI casing) gets lost. Read the one in front of you. Architecture at a glance You (main agent) drive the workflow per this SKILL.md. Python helpers do deterministic work — NO LLM inside, NO external API key. L1 OpenAlex (primary) → deep top-100 multi-strategy L2 PubMed (medical) → MeSH enricher (mostly; Audit-tier can search independently) L2 arXiv (CS/preprint) → T-0~T-4 freshness sentinel L3 Semantic Scholar → influentialCitationCount + abstract fallback L3 CrossRef → funder / license / clinical-trial-number Classification → Inline SubAgents (parallel, file-IPC, 5 per message) Output → HTML (Shadcn) + MD + BibTeX/RIS/CSV + PRISMA-S log The 4 tiers — pick first Tier Wall-clock Papers When to pick Quick ~5-8 min 20-60 "查一下" / "几篇" / "before tomorrow" / fast scope Standard (default) ~10-17 min 60-180 Scope a topic / write background / general lit search Deep ~30-45 min 180-400 "thorough" / writing a review article / 综述写作 Audit ~2-3 hr 400-1000+ "systematic review" / "PRISMA" / "Cochrane" / "meta-analysis" 📖 BEFORE picking, read references/tier_decision.md . Tell the user your choice and why. For Audit, show limitations warning + get explicit confirmation before starting. The recipe For every literature search, follow these steps in order. Each step references a references/ file for details. Skip files only when the step is obviously trivial for the case at hand — and announce the skip per Rule C. STEP 0 — Setup ($PSP_HOME + working directory) 📖 BEFORE THIS STEP, read: references/setup.md . Resolve the Skill install path into $PSP_HOME (every later step uses PYTHONPATH=$PSP_HOME ). Prefer explicit injection / agent env var; otherwise scan the known cross-agent install locations. If your harness already exposes this SKILL.md's absolute path, just export PSP_HOME="<that dir>" and skip the scan. 📖 Full rationale, why this can't be a script, and the complete path list: references/runtime_bootstrap.md . PSP_HOME= " ${PSP_HOME:- ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR:- ${CODEBUDDY_SKILL_DIR:-} } } " # explicit / agent-injected if [ -z " $PSP_HOME " ]; then # else scan known installs for base in " $HOME /.claude" " $HOME /.codex" " $HOME /.agents" " $HOME /.config/opencode" \ " $HOME /.codeium/windsurf" " $HOME /.config/goose" " $HOME /.cline" " $HOME /.roo" \ " $HOME /.copilot" ./.claude ./.codex ./.agents ./.cursor ./.opencode ./.windsurf; do [ -f " $base /skills/paper-search-pro/SKILL.md" ] && PSP_HOME= " $base /skills/paper-search-pro" && break done fi [ -z " $PSP_HOME " ] && { echo "ERROR: paper-search-pro install not found. Set PSP_HOME to the dir containing SKILL.md." ; exit 1; } export PSP_HOME; echo "Using Skill install: $PSP_HOME " Verify config keys (executed from any cwd, never cd into the Skill dir): PYTHONPATH= $PSP_HOME python3 -c \ "from scripts.config import load_config; c = load_config(); print('OK' if c.openalex_api_key and c.ncbi_email else 'MISSING — see references/setup.md')" If "MISSING", point the user to references/setup.md (5 keys, all free, ~15 min total) and halt. Set up the working directory variable — every subsequent step uses $SEARCH_DIR : SEARCH_ID= "<topic_slug>_<tier>_ $(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S) " # e.g. clt_education_quick_20260522_103045 SEARCH_DIR= " $(pwd) /paper-search-results/ $SEARCH_ID " mkdir -p " $SEARCH_DIR /raw" " $SEARCH_DIR /batches" " $SEARCH_DIR /classifications" echo "Outputs will land in: $SEARCH_DIR " $SEARCH_DIR is now an absolute path under the user's PWD . Use "$SEARCH_DIR/..." (quoted, with the variable) in every helper command below — not ./paper-search-results/... . STEP 1 — Plan the query (MANDATORY for all tiers) 📖 BEFORE THIS STEP, read: references/query_planner.md . Detect the report UI language — UI_LANG ( zh for Chinese queries, en for everything else) selects which UI language the final HTML report renders in. Paper titles / abstracts / authors / venues are NEVER translated — only the report's UI chrome. Pass --language $UI_LANG to STEP 12b. UI_LANG=$(PYTHONPATH= $PSP_HOME python3 -m scripts.detect_language " $USER_QUERY " ) The detector routes Japanese / Korean / European queries to English (the bundle ships only EN + ZH dictionaries; English is the international academic default). 📖 The exact Unicode rule and why kana is checked before Han live in references/runtime_bootstrap.md . Determine the search language space ( search_language , axis 2 — which literature ocean , distinct from UI_LANG above which is only report chrome ). 📖 The parsing SSOT is references/source_routing.md §"Language scope"; resolve the space here, before phrasing the query, because it changes how STEP 3's query is built. This is additive and opt-in — a pure English query resolves to the en space with zero new prompts or behavior (R-19) ; everything below fires only for Chinese queries or explicit signals. Read the persisted default config.search_language (auto | en | zh | both) and apply the priority ladder flags > in-query markers > config > auto . CJK presence is the mechanical fact from detect_language above; markers ( CSSCI , 中文文献 , SSCI , 知网 , …) and non-signals ( 中科院一区 , topic-about-China) are your semantic judgment per the §"Language scope" tables. auto + a Chinese (CJK) query + no language marker + no persisted value → ask ONE question before retrieving (this is the human path's job; the CLI/agent path passes through instead). Two sentences, offer to persist, and don't re-ask later this session: 你用中文提问——文献要英文、中文,还是都要?顺便可以说"以后都这样",我就记成默认、下次不再问。 "中文" / "都要" → enter that space (STEP 2 discipline routing takes over; report one line there). "英文" → v2.2 behavior (Chinese topic planned as an English query), report one line. "无所谓 / 都行" → this run uses both (Recall > Precision), not persisted; if the same user answers "无所谓" a second time, add one light offer to set both as default, then never ask again. Only an explicit "以后都…" persists to config.search_language (single answers never auto-persist). If a rank ambiguity (bare "Q1") also fired this run, merge both questions into ONE message — ask language + platform together, never in two rounds (over-asking is a red line). Once the space is known, phrase the query per references/query_planner.md §"Cross-language query handling": zh keeps Chinese search terms (no translation) , en uses the English terms (v2.2 behavior), both builds two sets. Apply PICO / SPIDER / PEO depending on domain: Medical/clinical → PICO (Population/Intervention/Comparator/Outcome) Qualitative → SPIDER Scoping → PEO (Population/Exposure/Outcome) Open-ended → just extract 2-4 concept blocks + 2-5 synonyms each Journal-rank intent recognition (additive — only acts when the query mentions a partition). Before you extract concept blocks, check whether the user's query carries a journal-rank/partition phrase — "中科院一区", "Q1", "JCR Q1", "SJR Q2", "顶刊 / top journal". If so, that phrase is a filter condition, not a search term , and it MUST be stripped from the topic before retrieval. This roots out the failure that motivated the whole feature: "中科院一区 情绪调节" used to send "中科院一区" to the search engine as a topic word, so it searched for papers about 中科院一区 instead of papers on 情绪调节 filtered to CAS tier 1. The deterministic parser does both jobs (extract + strip) for you: PYTHONPATH= $PSP_HOME python3 -c " from scripts.rank_intent import parse_rank_intent i = parse_rank_intent('''<original user query>''') import json; print(json.dumps({ 'platform': i.platform, 'tiers': i.tiers, 'quartiles': i.quartiles, 'top': i.top, 'ambiguous': i.ambiguous, 'cleaned_query': i.cleaned_query, 'stripped': i.matched}, ensure_ascii=False)) " Then act on the parse: cleaned_query is the real topic — use it (NOT the raw query) for STEP 3 retrieval and the query plan. When the query had no rank phrasing, cleaned_query == query and nothing changes (R-19 default path is untouched). platform + tiers / quartiles / top are the filter you will apply in STEP 10/11 — remember them; do not filter here. ambiguous == True (a bare "Q1"/"Q2" with no platform word — the recogniser never guesses a platform): ask the user one short question inline before going further — "按 JCR 还是 SJR 的 Q1 筛?顺便要不要设为以后的默认?" The CLI/headless path cannot ask, so this inline question is specifically the human path's job. If the query mentions no partition at all, skip this entirely — STEP 1 proceeds exactly as before. Even Quick tier needs a lightweight version of this step — never skip silently. Output: 1-3 search strategies (concept blocks + year range + work type filter). Write to "$SEARCH_DIR/query_plan.json" so PRISMA-S logger can pick it up later (STEP 13). STEP 2 — Route supplemental sources within the STEP-1 language space 📖 BEFORE THIS STEP, read: references/source_routing.md . You make these routing calls by judging the query's domain — the reference's keyword tables are calibration examples, not a match list (mechanical facts — CJK detection, explicit --flags — stay deterministic). Within the language space fixed in STEP 1, route the per-discipline boosters: English space ( en , or the English half of both ) — unchanged from v2.2: Medical signals (RCT, PRISMA, MeSH, clinical, disease names) → enable PubMed CS/preprint signals (preprint, arXiv, NeurIPS, transformer, "最新", 2024+) → enable arXiv Cross-domain (e.g. "AI in radiology") → enable both Pure social science / humanities → OpenAlex only (Judgment call: a core AI/CS query may also raise the primary engine to Semantic Scholar — see source_routing.md §"AI / CS queries → consider Semantic Scholar as primary".) Chinese space ( zh , or the Chinese half of both ) — route the Chinese boosters the same way, by discipline: Social-science / humanities signal → add NSSD (国家哲社文献中心; carries the CSSCI 收录标识 OpenAlex has ≈0 coverage of) Medical signal → add yiigle (中华医学期刊全文数据库); PubMed still covers MEDLINE-indexed 中华 journals, so the two are complementary Pure sci-tech with neither → Chinese side runs on OpenAlex only (sci-tech Chinese core journals mostly register DOIs, so OpenAlex covers them well) Report one line (axis-3 style — a statement, not a question; 22 §6.3). For an English-only run this is the existing PubMed/arXiv notice, unchanged ( "I detected medical + CS signals — also searching PubMed and arXiv. Override with --no-pubmed ." ). For a Chinese space, e.g.: 本次按「中英都要」检索;中文侧检测到社科主题,已加 NSSD(国家哲社文献中心)。想去掉说 --no-nssd ,只查一边说"只要英文/中文"。 Coverage honesty rides with the notice: if the zh space has a social-science topic but the user declined NSSD, add that OpenAlex hits ≈0 on CSSCI flagship journals (经济研究 / 管理世界 …), so that layer is missing. User can override any of this with an explicit instruction (a per-query override wins over everything). On the --flag shorthands above ( --no-nssd , --no-pubmed , --source … ): on this human path they are natural-language override notation — a compact way to write what the user can say ("去掉 NSSD" / "只查 OpenAlex"), which you (the LLM) interpret. They are not executable CLI flags — no script parses them here. The only real, script-parsed flags live on the agent/headless path ( agent_search ), and there the Chinese-source control is opt- in : --with-nssd / --with-yiigle (there is no --no-nssd / --source there). See references/agent_mode.md .
Keywords that activate this skill. Click one to copy it.

This skill does not provide trigger words.

The downloaded .skill package contains the following fields.
Field Description
formatFormat tag (skill/v1)
skill_idUnique skill ID
nameSkill name
versionVersion
descriptionDescription
categoryCategories (array)
trigger_wordsTrigger words
tagsTags
sourceSource
source_urlSource URL (this page)
exported_atExported at (set per download)
system_promptSystem prompt body
model_configModel config: provider / model / temperature / max_tokens / top_p
examplesExamples
install_guideImport guide for Coze / Dify / Claude / custom frameworks
The same skill can be exported in different platform formats.
.skill Standard format with system_prompt and model_config, ready for any agent framework Download
.skillpro Enhanced format with scripts, tools, dependencies and hooks Download
.json Plain JSON export with system_prompt and model parameters only Download
Coze Markdown with frontmatter, for Coze platform import Download
Dify Dify DSL, import directly after creating an app Download

每日精选 Skill 推荐,免费送到你邮箱

输入邮箱,每天接收一个精选 AI Agent 技能推荐。完全免费,持续更新。

提交后我们会发送一封确认邮件,点击邮件里的链接才会开始收信。

完全免费,取消任意时间。我们不会发送垃圾邮件。