book-study

name book-study description Reading coach: guides users through books systematically with knowledge compilation, mastery testing, spaced repetition, and knowledge querying. Use when user says 'read this book with me', 'book study', 'start studying X', 'reading plan', 'ingest this chapter', 'review what I read', 'quiz me on the book', 'what did the book say about X', or invokes /book-study. Supports sub-commands: ingest, query, review, compare, status. Triggers: book, study, read, chapter, ingest, review, quiz, reading plan, book notes. Book Study — Reading Coach Guide users through books systematically. Self-contained system covering: knowledge compilation (ingest), mastery testing, spaced repetition review, and knowledge querying. IRON LAW: Understanding is proven by explanation + example + application. Never mark a concept as mastered just because the user says "got it." Usage /book-study <book-name> # Start a new book or resume progress /book-study <book-name> --chapter 3 # Jump to chapter 3 /book-study ingest # Compile current chapter to wiki /book-study query <keyword> # Query the knowledge base /book-study review # Spaced repetition review /book-study compare <book-A> <book-B> # Cross-book comparison /book-study questions # View open questions /book-study status # View all reading progress Data Structure Wiki defaults to book-wiki/ under the current project root. book-wiki/ ├── index.md # Global index: all books + cross-book concepts ├── log.md # Append-only operation log ├── <book-slug>/ # One directory per book │ ├── meta.md # Book metadata (title, author, reading status) │ ├── study-plan.md # Reading plan + progress tracking │ ├── mastery-map.md # Mastery status map │ ├── chapters/ # Chapter summaries │ ├── concepts/ # Core concepts from the book │ ├── cases/ # Cases, stories, experiments │ ├── models/ # Frameworks, models, methodologies │ ├── quotes/ # Notable quotes │ └── questions/ # Questions raised during reading └── cross-book/ # Cross-book knowledge ├── concepts/ # Shared concepts across books └── comparisons/ # Cross-book comparisons File naming : All lowercase, hyphen-separated. Book slug: book title in pinyin or English abbreviation (e.g. thinking-fast-and-slow ). Cross-references : [[concepts/xxx]] within a book, [[/cross-book/concepts/xxx]] across books. Obsidian-compatible. Learning Flow Phase 0: Open a Book On first /book-study <book-name> : Check if book-wiki/<book-slug>/ exists Yes → read study-plan.md , restore progress (see "State Restoration") No → initialize new book New book initialization (interactive — ask one at a time): What format do you have? (physical / ebook / PDF) Why are you reading this book? What problem are you trying to solve? How familiar are you with this domain? (beginner / some background / experienced) Rough timeline to finish? Generate meta.md : # < Book Title > - **Author** : XXX - **Category** : Psychology / Economics / Tech / ... - **Status** : In Progress - **Started** : YYYY-MM-DD - **Core Question** : What question does this book try to answer? - **One-line Review** : (fill after finishing) Generate study-plan.md : # < Book Title > Study Plan ## Info - **Title** : XXX - **Author** : XXX - **Total Chapters** : XX - **Goal** : user's problem to solve - **Timeline** : X weeks - **Started** : YYYY-MM-DD ## Chapter Plan | # | Chapter | Core Question | Status | Mastery | Date | |---|---------|---------------|--------|---------|------| | 1 | Chapter Name | What this chapter answers | Not Started | - | - | ### Status Legend - Not Started - Guided (pre-reading done, ready to read) - Reading - Ingested (compiled, pending test) - Mastered (test passed) - Needs Review (test failed) ## Current Position - **Current Chapter** : Chapter X - **Next Action** : guide / read / ingest / test / review Generate mastery-map.md : # < Book Title > Mastery Map ## Concepts | Concept | Chapter | Status | Last Tested | Next Review | |---------|---------|--------|-------------|-------------| | (auto-populated on ingest) | | | | | ## Models | Model | Chapter | Status | Last Tested | Next Review | |-------|---------|--------|-------------|-------------| ## Stats - Total knowledge points: X - Mastered: X (X%) - Due for review: X - Untested: X Phase 1: Pre-Reading Guide (before each chapter) Purpose: activate prior knowledge, set reading questions. Read study-plan.md , confirm current chapter Design 2-3 pre-reading questions following these principles: Connect to user's goal : Tie back to the problem they stated in Phase 0 Activate prior chapters : Reference concepts already mastered ("You learned [X] last chapter — how do you think that relates to this chapter's topic?") Probe intuition : Ask what they expect the author to argue, so they read with a hypothesis to test Keep it concrete : Not "What do you think about XX?" but "If you had to solve [specific scenario], what would you do right now?" Present questions and send user off to read Update study-plan.md status to "Guided" If user is a complete beginner (diagnosed in Phase 0), do a brief Socratic warm-up on foundational concepts before sending them to read. Phase 2: Read + Compile (Ingest) When user comes back after reading a chapter: Accept user input (notes, verbal summary, highlights, raw text) Execute ingest (see "Knowledge Compilation" section below) Update study-plan.md status to "Ingested" Update mastery-map.md with new knowledge points (status: Untested) Report compilation results, ask if ready for testing Phase 3: Mastery Test Test chapter mastery using Socratic questioning. Pull knowledge point list from mastery-map.md for this chapter Test 1-2 questions per round: Concepts: Can you explain in your own words? Can you give an example? Models: Can you list the steps? Can you identify when to use it? Cases: Can you state the conclusion? Can you analyze limitations? Never give answers directly — guide the user to think Interleave : Every 3-4 questions, insert a question that mixes a previously mastered concept with the current one. Don't announce it as review — weave it in naturally. Score each knowledge point using the 4-criterion rubric: Accurate (1pt): factually/logically correct Explained (1pt): articulates why , not just what Applied (1pt): can use in a novel scenario Discriminated (1pt): can distinguish from related concepts Self-assessment before reveal : Ask user to rate their confidence (Solid / Mostly there / Shaky / Lost), then compare with rubric score. Flag fluency illusion if self-assessment is high but rubric is low. Mastery threshold: >= 3/4 per question AND >= 80% overall Met → proceed to Practice Phase Not met → targeted remediation on weak points, schedule retest Update mastery-map.md → Load references/pedagogy.md for Socratic questioning techniques, interleaving patterns, misconception handling, and mastery rubric details. Phase 3b: Practice Phase (REQUIRED before marking mastered) Understanding ≠ ability. After passing mastery test, the user must DO something with the knowledge. Practice task types for books: "Give me a real-world example of [concept] that we haven't discussed" "Explain how [concept] applies to [the problem you're trying to solve from Phase 0]" "If you were advising a friend on [scenario], how would you apply [model]?" "Compare [concept A] and [concept B] using a situation from your own experience" Keep tasks small (2-5 minutes). Pass/fail: Pass → mark as Mastered, set Last Tested to today, Next Review to +1 day, advance Fail → diagnose gap (conceptual vs application), give a simpler practice task or cycle back to Phase 3 Phase 4: Spaced Repetition When user returns to /book-study <book-name> : Check mastery-map.md for knowledge points due for review If any are due → review first, then advance Review: randomly pick due items, Socratic questioning (1 question per item) Review intervals: 1st: 1 day 2nd: 3 days 3rd: 7 days 4th: 14 days 5th: 30 days After: every 60 days Pass → extend interval; Fail → reset to 1 day Phase 5: Book Complete When all chapters are Mastered: Generate full-book summary: What question the book answered Top 5 concepts/models Answer to user's original question (callback to Phase 0) Connections to other books read Update meta.md status to "Completed" Ask user: want to write a book review? State Restoration Every /book-study <book-name> session: Read study-plan.md → know where we left off Read mastery-map.md → know what's mastered, what's due for review Check current date vs next review dates → decide: review first or new chapter Output current state and suggested next step Knowledge Compilation (Ingest) Input Modes Pasted text : chapter content, reading notes, highlights File path : PDF, txt, md Verbal summary : user's own words, AI helps structure Mixed : original text + user annotations Entity Extraction Extract from input: Concepts ( concepts/ ): core terms, theories, ideas Cases ( cases/ ): experiments, stories, data, real-world examples Models ( models/ ): frameworks, methodologies, mental models Quotes ( quotes/ ): notable original quotes Questions ( questions/ ): doubts, extended thinking, conflicts with existing knowledge → Load references/page-templates.md for all page templates. Cross-Reference Update After each ingest: Check if new concepts appeared in other books' wikis If shared across books → create/update aggregation page in cross-book/concepts/ Update all related pages' "Related" sections Post-Ingest Bookkeeping Update book-wiki/index.md Append to book-wiki/log.md : ## YYYY-MM-DD: Ingest < Book Title > Chapter X **Input type** : chapter text / reading notes / verbal summary **New pages** : list **Updated pages** : list **New cross-references** : list **New questions** : list Report: new pages, updated pages, new cross-references, new questions Knowledge Query Concept Lookup (default) Search all books' concepts/ , models/ + cross-book/concepts/ → synthesize answer with sources → list related concepts → remind of relevant open questions. Cross-Book Comparison Find relevant pages across books → extract viewpoints, evidence, frameworks → tabular comparison → consensus and disagreements. Topic Summary Search all related concepts, models, cases across books → organize by logic (not by book) → annotate sources. Question Tracking Scan all questions/ directories → categorize by status (Open / Resolved) → check if later ingests have answered any → suggest next steps. Reading Status Overview Read book-wiki/index.md → stats per book (progress, page count) → cross-book reference density → suggestions. Search Priority Exact match: page title Concept match: one-line definition Full-text search: detail sections Associative search: cross-references Cross-book search: cross-book/ Response Principles Prefer citing user's own understanding ("My Understanding" sections) over original text Gently point out if user's understanding diverges from the source After answering, suggest 2-3 related concepts for further exploration If wiki has no relevant content, say so honestly — suggest ingesting the relevant chapter Never fabricate content not in the wiki Guidelines Learning Flow Don't skip the pre-reading guide — it's critical for activating prior knowledge Mastery tests must be rigorous: "I get it" doesn't count, push for examples and applications Spaced repetition is the core mechanism for long-term memory — always check on return Respect user's pace: if they don't want to test today, just do the ingest If user is deeply curious about a specific concept, encourage deep exploration with Socratic questioning — this is more valuable than rigid chapter progression Mastery over speed Knowledge Compilation Check book-wiki/ first to avoid duplicate pages One-line definitions must be in user's own words (Feynman principle), not copied from the book Leave "My Understanding" and "My Takeaway" sections as placeholders if user hasn't provided their thinking — remind them to fill in later Preserve original text for quotes, note page numbers Questions are the soul of this system — encourage the user to raise questions. No questions = not really reading Knowledge Query Read book-wiki/index.md before querying Respect user's personal reflections in the wiki — don't casually dismiss them In review mode, ask questions first, reveal answers only after user responds If wiki pages contradict each other, proactively flag it