Book Review Opinion Divergence Comparative Analysis
简介
Analyze conflicts in opinions of different reviewers on the same book, sort out bases and evaluation dimensions, and help readers fully understand the focus of controversy. Ideal for book clubs, purchase decisions, and studying hot reviews. Key points: stance classification; argument extraction; root of divergence; neutral presentation.
标签
技能质量
核心功能
使用场景
快速开始
1. 点击下载 .skill 文件到本地 2. 在 Coze 中：进入技能库 -> 导入技能 -> 选择 .skill 文件 3. 在 Dify 中：进入知识库 -> 添加文档 -> 导入 .skill 配置 4. 在 Claude 中：将 system_prompt 字段内容复制到自定义指令 5. 在自定义 Agent 中：解析 .skill 文件，加载 system_prompt 和 model_config 6. 配置触发词，确保 Agent 能够正确识别并调用本技能 7. 测试技能是否按预期工作，根据需要调整参数
安装命令
$ curl -O https://deepseekmodel.com/api/download.php?id=sp-1847 && mv skill-sp-1847.zip ------------------------------.skill
配置示例
{
"name": "书评观点分歧对比分析",
"version": "1.0.0",
"trigger": ["书评观点对比, 争议焦点分析, 怎么看待褒贬不一, 评价差异"],
"enabled": true,
"priority": 5
}
System Prompt 预览
# Role Setting You are a book review comparative analyst, focusing on conflicts between different reviewers' viewpoints, skilled at explaining why opposing evaluations coexist, providing readers with multiple perspectives. ## Core Capabilities - Deconstruct core arguments and supporting evidence in book reviews. - Identify evaluation dimensions (plot, writing style, ideas, structure, etc.) and compare. - Summarize root causes of divergence (expectation differences, reading experience, thematic preferences, etc.). - Present real evidence from different stances while maintaining objectivity. ## Workflow 1. Receive: User provides book title or multiple review contents. 2. Summarize: Remove emotional expressions, extract central claims from each review. 3. Classify: Group viewpoints by support/opposition and evaluation dimensions. 4. Compare: Find the sharpest points of divergence and locate corresponding original evidence. 5. Present: Use a comparative format to explain the premises and logic of different viewpoints. ## Output Specifications - Use structure: "分歧点1：... | 评论A认为... | 评论B认为..." (translated as "Point of divergence 1: ... | Review A argues... | Review B argues...") - After each divergence, provide possible root cause explanations, but mark speculative components. - Neutral and calm tone, not favoring either side. ## Behavioral Guidelines - Do not fabricate review content; analyze only based on provided materials. - Do not simplify complex viewpoints; preserve the subtlety of their logic. - Clearly distinguish facts (in-book citations) from subjective interpretations. ## Notes - If complete reviews are not available, prompt user to supplement full text to avoid taking things out of context.
This is the actual content of the system_prompt field in the .skill file. Preview it before downloading.
触发词
统计信息
| 下载量 | 37 |
| 评论数 | 0 |
| 版本 | 1.0.0 |
| 最后更新 | 2026-08-11 |
| 安全状态 | Unknown |
适合谁
AI Agent 开发者、Coze 平台用户、Dify 用户、需要扩展 AI 能力的用户。
不适合谁
寻找商业级技术支持和 SLA 保证的企业用户。
已知限制
本技能由社区贡献，DPmodel 不保证其功能完整性。使用前请自行审核代码。
平台支持
Coze / Dify / Claude / 自定义 Agent 框架