investor-materials

name investor-materials description Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets. Investor Materials Build investor-facing materials that are consistent, credible, and easy to defend. When to Activate creating or revising a pitch deck writing an investor memo or one-pager building a financial model, milestone plan, or use-of-funds table answering accelerator or incubator application questions aligning multiple fundraising docs around one source of truth Golden Rule All investor materials must agree with each other. Create or confirm a single source of truth before writing: traction metrics pricing and revenue assumptions raise size and instrument use of funds team bios and titles milestones and timelines If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting. Core Workflow inventory the canonical facts identify missing assumptions choose the asset type draft the asset with explicit logic cross-check every number against the source of truth Asset Guidance Pitch Deck Recommended flow: company + wedge problem solution product / demo market business model traction team competition / differentiation ask use of funds / milestones appendix If the user wants a web-native deck, pair this skill with frontend-slides . One-Pager / Memo state what the company does in one clean sentence show why now include traction and proof points early make the ask precise keep claims easy to verify Financial Model Include: explicit assumptions bear / base / bull cases when useful clean layer-by-layer revenue logic milestone-linked spending sensitivity analysis where the decision hinges on assumptions Accelerator Applications answer the exact question asked prioritize traction, insight, and team advantage avoid puffery keep internal metrics consistent with the deck and model Red Flags to Avoid unverifiable claims fuzzy market sizing without assumptions inconsistent team roles or titles revenue math that does not sum cleanly inflated certainty where assumptions are fragile Quality Gate Before delivering: every number matches the current source of truth use of funds and revenue layers sum correctly assumptions are visible, not buried the story is clear without hype language the final asset is defensible in a partner meeting