test-coverage

name test-coverage description MUST be used whenever fixing test coverage for a Flows app to meet the 80% line coverage hard gate. This skill finds AND fixes coverage gaps — it configures tooling, writes missing tests, covers untested paths, and refactors code for testability. It does not just report. Triggers: test coverage, fix tests, write tests, add tests, coverage fix, 80% coverage, coverage gate, missing tests, testability, vitest coverage, jest coverage. allowed-tools Read, Glob, Grep, Shell, Write metadata {"argument-hint":"[directory or file to audit, or leave blank for the whole app]"} Test Coverage Fix Fix test coverage for $ARGUMENTS (or the whole app if no argument is given). This skill enforces the 80% line coverage hard gate required for Flows app approval by finding AND fixing coverage gaps. Work through every step in order. Step 1 — Verify test framework and coverage tooling Check that the project has a working test framework with coverage configured: # Check for vitest or jest in package.json grep -E "(vitest|jest)" package.json # Check for coverage configuration cat vitest.config.ts 2>/dev/null || cat vitest.config.js 2>/dev/null || cat jest.config.ts 2>/dev/null || cat jest.config.js 2>/dev/null Verify: A test framework (Vitest or Jest) is installed and configured The config file has a coverage section (e.g. coverage: { provider: 'v8', ... } in vitest.config.ts) A coverage reporter is configured (at least text and lcov or json-summary ) If coverage tooling is not configured, fix it now: Install the coverage provider: pnpm add -D @vitest/coverage-v8 Add the coverage configuration to vitest.config.ts . Read the existing config file, then add the coverage section inside test : // vitest.config.ts — minimum coverage configuration to add test : { coverage : { provider : 'v8' , reporter : [ 'text' , 'text-summary' , 'lcov' ], include : [ 'src/**/*.{ts,tsx}' ], exclude : [ 'src/**/*.test.{ts,tsx}' , 'src/**/*.spec.{ts,tsx}' , 'src/**/vite-env.d.ts' , 'src/main.tsx' , ], }, } Write the updated config file. If no vitest.config.ts exists at all, create one with the full defineConfig wrapper. Step 2 — Validate coverage scope The 80% threshold applies to all .ts and .tsx files under src/ , excluding only: Test files ( *.test.ts , *.test.tsx , *.spec.ts , *.spec.tsx ) Type declaration files ( vite-env.d.ts ) The entry point ( main.tsx ) Apps must not exclude pages, components, hooks, or other production code from coverage measurement. # Check what files are excluded from coverage in the config grep -A 20 "exclude" vitest.config.ts 2>/dev/null || grep -A 20 "exclude" vitest.config.js 2>/dev/null # Check for coveragePathIgnorePatterns in jest config grep -A 10 "coveragePathIgnorePatterns\|collectCoverageFrom" jest.config.ts 2>/dev/null If the config excludes production files, fix it now: Remove any exclusion that hides production code from coverage measurement. Only test files, type declarations, and the entry point should be excluded. Rewrite the exclude array to contain only: exclude : [ 'src/**/*.test.{ts,tsx}' , 'src/**/*.spec.{ts,tsx}' , 'src/**/vite-env.d.ts' , 'src/main.tsx' , ], Specifically remove any exclusions for: src/pages/ or src/components/ or src/hooks/ — NOT allowed Specific feature files — NOT allowed unless they are generated code src/**/*.tsx (all components) — NOT allowed , this hides the majority of the app Write the corrected config file. Step 3 — Run tests and collect coverage # Try common coverage commands based on project setup npx vitest run --coverage 2>/dev/null || npx jest --coverage 2>/dev/null || npm test -- --coverage 2>/dev/null Record the coverage summary: Statements: X% Branches: X% Functions: X% Lines: X% Hard gate: Overall line coverage must be at least 80% . Apps below this threshold are listed as must fix . If tests fail to run, fix them now: Common fixes: Missing imports: Read the failing test file, add the missing import statement, write the fixed file. Broken mocks: Read the test to understand what is being mocked. Fix the mock to match the current API of the mocked module. Outdated snapshots: Run npx vitest run --update to update snapshots, then review the diff to ensure correctness. Missing dependencies: Run pnpm add -D <missing-package> for any test utilities not yet installed. Config errors: Read the config file, fix syntax or option errors, write the corrected file. Re-run tests after each fix until all tests pass. Then record the coverage summary. Step 4 — Find and write missing test files For every non-trivial .ts / .tsx file under src/ , check whether a corresponding test file exists: # List all production files and check for test counterparts for file in $(find src -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" | grep -v ".test." | grep -v ".spec." | grep -v "node_modules" | grep -v "vite-env" | sort ); do base= " ${file%.*} " ext= " ${file##*.} " dir =$( dirname " $file " ) filename=$( basename " $base " ) # Check for test file in same directory or __tests__ directory test_exists= "false" for pattern in " ${base} .test. ${ext} " " ${base} .spec. ${ext} " " ${base} .test.ts" " ${base} .spec.ts" " ${dir} /__tests__/ ${filename} .test. ${ext} " " ${dir} /__tests__/ ${filename} .spec. ${ext} " ; do if [ -f " $pattern " ]; then test_exists= "true" break fi done if [ " $test_exists " = "false" ]; then echo "NO TEST: $file " fi done Categorize each file without a test: Services, hooks, utils, contexts, ViewModel hooks — Write the test file now (see below) Pure presentational components with no logic — Mark as N/A (no test required) Barrel exports ( index.ts that only re-exports) — Mark as N/A Type-only files ( .d.ts , files with only type/interface exports) — Mark as N/A For each file missing a test, create a comprehensive test file. Use context injection for dependency mocking where the production code supports it. If the production code uses hard-coded imports, note this as a testability concern but still write the test using vi.mock with a justification comment. Follow this process for each: Read the source file to understand its exports, dependencies, and logic. Create a .test.ts or .test.tsx file in the same directory as the source file. Write tests covering: happy path, error path, empty state, and edge cases. Use the right testing pattern for each file type: For hooks: Test with renderHook from @testing-library/react Wrap with necessary providers (QueryClientProvider, custom context providers, etc.) Test initial state, loading state, success state, and error state Example structure: import { renderHook, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react' ; import { QueryClient , QueryClientProvider } from '@tanstack/react-query' ; // import the hook const createWrapper = ( ) => { const queryClient = new QueryClient ({ defaultOptions : { queries : { retry : false } }, }); return ( { children }: { children: React.ReactNode } ) => ( < QueryClientProvider client = {queryClient} > {children} </ QueryClientProvider > ); }; describe ( 'useMyHook' , () => { it ( 'returns data on success' , async () => { const { result } = renderHook ( () => useMyHook (), { wrapper : createWrapper () }); await waitFor ( () => expect (result. current . data ). toBeDefined ()); }); it ( 'handles errors' , async () => { // set up error condition const { result } = renderHook ( () => useMyHook (), { wrapper : createWrapper () }); await waitFor ( () => expect (result. current . error ). toBeDefined ()); }); }); For services/utils: Test with direct function calls Mock CDF SDK responses where needed Test return values, side effects, and thrown errors Example structure: import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest' ; // import the service/util functions describe ( 'myService' , () => { it ( 'returns expected result for valid input' , () => { const result = myFunction (validInput); expect (result). toEqual (expectedOutput); }); it ( 'throws on invalid input' , () => { expect ( () => myFunction (invalidInput)). toThrow (); }); }); For components with logic: Test with render from @testing-library/react Verify loading, error, and data states Test user interactions that trigger state changes Example structure: import { render, screen, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react' ; import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event' ; // import the component and providers describe ( 'MyComponent' , () => { it ( 'shows loading state initially' , () => { render ( < MyComponent /> , { wrapper : createWrapper () }); expect (screen. getByText ( /loading/i )). toBeInTheDocument (); }); it ( 'renders data after loading' , async () => { render ( < MyComponent /> , { wrapper : createWrapper () }); await waitFor ( () => { expect (screen. getByText ( 'expected content' )). toBeInTheDocument (); }); }); }); Dependency mocking guidelines: Use context injection (not vi.mock ) where possible — provide test dependencies via the hook's context. If the production code uses hard-coded imports that prevent context injection, use vi.mock with a justification comment explaining why (e.g., // vi.mock required: useDataSource uses direct import, not context injection ). Ensure mocks are type-safe — no as unknown as T casts. Define proper mock objects that satisfy the interface. After writing each test file, run npx vitest run <test-file> to verify it passes. Step 5 — Fix low-coverage files If the coverage tool produces per-file metrics, list files below 80% line coverage: # Parse lcov or text output for per-file coverage cat coverage/coverage-summary.json 2>/dev/null | node -e " const data = JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('/dev/stdin','utf8')); Object.entries(data).forEach(([file, metrics]) => { if (file === 'total') return; const pct = metrics.lines?.pct ?? 0; if (pct < 80) console.log(pct.toFixed(1) + '% — ' + file); }); " 2>/dev/null For each file below 80% coverage, read the uncovered lines from the coverage report, then add test cases that exercise those specific code paths: Read the uncovered lines from the coverage report. Check the coverage/ directory for detailed per-file reports (lcov or html) that show which lines are uncovered. Read the source file to understand what those uncovered lines do. Add test cases that exercise those specific code paths: Uncovered error paths: Add tests that trigger error conditions (network failures, invalid input, null values, permission errors). Force errors by providing bad input or mocking dependencies to throw. Uncovered branches: Add tests for each conditional branch. If an if/else has only the true branch tested, write a test that triggers the false branch. Uncovered functions: Add tests that call each exported function that lacks coverage. Verify return values and side effects. Uncovered catch blocks: Mock the upstream call to reject/throw, verify the catch block behavior. Run coverage again after adding tests to verify the file now meets 80%: npx vitest run --coverage <test-file> Repeat until each file reaches at least 80% line coverage or you have covered all feasible paths. Step 6 — Fix testability patterns Assess and fix testability issues in the codebase: # Check for dependency injection via context grep -rn --include= "*.ts" --include= "*.tsx" "useContext\|createContext" src/hooks/ src/contexts/ # Check for vi.mock usage (red flag for testability) grep -rn --include= "*.ts" --include= "*.tsx" "vi\.mock" src/ # Check for unsafe casts in tests grep -rn --include= "*.ts" --include= "*.tsx" "as unknown as" src/ | grep -E "\.test\.|\.spec\." # Check for interface-based services grep -rn --include= "*.ts" --include= "*.tsx" -E "implements\s+\w+" src/ For each testability issue found, refactor the production code to support better testing patterns. Then update the corresponding test to use the improved pattern. | Issue | Fix |