automation-audit-ops

name automation-audit-ops description Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything. metadata {"origin":"ECC"} Automation Audit Ops Use this when the user asks what automations are live, which jobs are broken, where overlap exists, or what tooling and connectors are actually doing useful work right now. This is an audit-first operator skill. The job is to produce an evidence-backed inventory and a keep / merge / cut / fix-next recommendation set before rewriting anything. Skill Stack Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant: workspace-surface-audit for connector, MCP, hook, and app inventory knowledge-ops when the audit needs to reconcile live repo truth with durable context github-ops when the answer depends on CI, scheduled workflows, issues, or PR automation ecc-tools-cost-audit when the real problem is webhook fanout, queued jobs, or billing burn in the sibling app repo research-ops when local inventory must be compared against current platform support or public docs verification-loop for proving post-fix state instead of relying on assumed recovery When to Use user asks "what automations do I have", "what is live", "what is broken", or "what overlaps" the task spans cron jobs, GitHub Actions, local hooks, MCP servers, connectors, wrappers, or app integrations the user wants to know what was ported from another agent system and what still needs to be rebuilt inside ECC the workspace has accumulated multiple ways to do the same thing and the user wants one canonical lane Guardrails start read-only unless the user explicitly asked for fixes separate: configured authenticated recently verified stale or broken missing entirely do not claim a tool is live just because a skill or config references it do not merge or delete overlapping surfaces until the evidence table exists Workflow 1. Inventory the real surface Read the current live surface before theorizing: repo hooks and local hook scripts GitHub Actions and scheduled workflows MCP configs and enabled servers connector- or app-backed integrations wrapper scripts and repo-specific automation entrypoints Group them by surface: local runtime repo CI / automation connected external systems messaging / notifications billing / customer operations research / monitoring 2. Classify each item by live state For every surfaced automation, mark: configured authenticated recently verified stale or broken missing Then classify the problem type: active breakage auth outage stale status overlap or redundancy missing capability 3. Trace the proof path Back every important claim with a concrete source: file path workflow run hook log config entry recent command output exact failure signature If the current state is ambiguous, say so directly instead of pretending the audit is complete. 4. End with keep / merge / cut / fix-next For each overlapping or suspect surface, return one call: keep merge cut fix next The value is in collapsing noisy automation into one canonical ECC lane, not in preserving every historical path. Output Format CURRENT SURFACE - automation - source - live state - proof FINDINGS - active breakage - overlap - stale status - missing capability RECOMMENDATION - keep - merge - cut - fix next NEXT ECC MOVE - exact skill / hook / workflow / app lane to strengthen Pitfalls do not answer from memory when the live inventory can be read do not treat "present in config" as "working" do not fix lower-value redundancy before naming the broken high-signal path do not widen the task into a repo rewrite if the user asked for inventory first Verification important claims cite a live proof path each surfaced automation is labeled with a clear live-state category the final recommendation distinguishes keep / merge / cut / fix-next