mfg-oee-analysis
Calculate and diagnose Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) by decomposing into Availability, Performance, and Quality rates. Use this skill when the user needs to measure production line efficiency, identify equipment losses, benchmark manufacturing performance, or justify capital investment — even if they say 'why is our output low', 'machine utilization report', 'production efficiency', or 'how much capacity are we losing'.
DeepseekModel
官方收录技能
质量 优秀 · 78
v1.0.0
获取
https://deepseekmodel.com/api/download.php?id=asgard-ai-platform-skills-mfg-oee-analysis-skill-md&format=skill
下载 .skill
标准格式,含 system_prompt 与 model_config,导入任意 Agent 框架即可使用
.skill 文件中 system_prompt 字段的实际内容。
name mfg-oee-analysis description Calculate and diagnose Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) by decomposing into Availability, Performance, and Quality rates. Use this skill when the user needs to measure production line efficiency, identify equipment losses, benchmark manufacturing performance, or justify capital investment — even if they say 'why is our output low', 'machine utilization report', 'production efficiency', or 'how much capacity are we losing'. metadata {"category":"WP-03 製造業","tags":["manufacturing","oee","production-efficiency"]} OEE Analysis Framework IRON LAW: OEE = Availability × Performance × Quality OEE is a MULTIPLICATIVE metric. 90% × 90% × 90% = 72.9%, not 90%. Each factor compounds the loss. World-class OEE is 85%+. Most plants operate at 60-65%. Knowing the TOTAL is useless — you must decompose to find which factor is dragging performance down. The Three Factors Factor Formula Measures Loss Categories Availability Run Time / Planned Production Time Uptime vs downtime Equipment failures, changeovers, material shortages Performance (Ideal Cycle Time × Total Count) / Run Time Actual speed vs design speed Minor stops, slow running, idling Quality Good Count / Total Count Yield, first-pass quality Defects, rework, scrap, startup rejects Six Big Losses (mapped to OEE factors) Loss OEE Factor Example 1. Equipment failure Availability Machine breakdown, unplanned repair 2. Setup & changeover Availability Product changeover, die change, cleaning 3. Idling & minor stops Performance Sensor blockage, jam clearing, small adjustments 4. Reduced speed Performance Running below rated speed due to wear or material 5. Process defects Quality In-process rejects, rework 6. Startup rejects Quality Scrap during warm-up, first-article failures Calculation Example Planned Production Time: 480 min (8-hour shift) Downtime (breakdowns + changeover): 60 min Run Time: 420 min Ideal Cycle Time: 1 min/unit Total Units Produced: 380 Good Units: 360 Defective Units: 20 Availability = 420 / 480 = 87.5% Performance = (1 × 380) / 420 = 90.5% Quality = 360 / 380 = 94.7% OEE = 87.5% × 90.5% × 94.7% = 75.0% Diagnosis Steps Phase 1: Calculate OEE for each production line/machine Phase 2: Identify the weakest factor (Availability, Performance, or Quality) Phase 3: Pareto the losses within that factor (which specific loss is biggest?) Phase 4: Root cause analysis on the top loss (5 Whys, fishbone) Phase 5: Improve and remeasure Benchmarks OEE Level Rating Typical > 85% World-class Top manufacturers 60-85% Typical Room for improvement 40-60% Low Significant losses, urgent action needed < 40% Critical Equipment or process fundamentally broken Output Format # OEE Report: {Production Line} ## OEE Summary | Factor | Value | Benchmark | Status | |--------|-------|-----------|--------| | Availability | {%} | >90% | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | | Performance | {%} | >95% | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | | Quality | {%} | >99% | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | | **OEE** | **{%}** | **>85%** | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | ## Loss Breakdown | Loss | Minutes Lost | % of Total Loss | Priority | |------|-------------|----------------|---------| | {loss type} | {min} | {%} | 1/2/3 | ## Root Cause (Top Loss) {5 Whys or fishbone analysis} ## Improvement Plan | Action | Target Impact | Timeline | Owner | |--------|-------------|----------|-------| | {action} | +{X%} OEE | {weeks} | {who} | Gotchas OEE is per machine, not per plant : Plant-level OEE averages hide that one machine at 95% and another at 45% average to 70%. Analyze individually. Planned downtime is excluded : OEE measures losses against PLANNED production time. Scheduled maintenance, no-production shifts, and planned shutdowns are excluded from the denominator. 100% OEE is not the goal : It would mean zero changeovers, zero defects, running at max speed 100% of the time. Pursuing 100% can increase costs (e.g., never doing preventive maintenance). Target 85%+ for critical lines. Data collection is the real challenge : Manual OEE tracking is inaccurate. Invest in automated data collection (sensors, MES integration) for reliable measurement. References For TPM (Total Productive Maintenance) methodology, see references/tpm.md For automated OEE data collection, see references/oee-automation.md
Agent 识别该技能的关键词,点击任意一个即可复制。
该技能未提供触发词。
下载的 .skill 包内含以下字段。
| 字段 | 说明 |
|---|---|
| format | 格式标识(skill/v1) |
| skill_id | 技能唯一 ID |
| name | 技能名称 |
| version | 版本号 |
| description | 技能描述 |
| category | 所属分类(数组) |
| trigger_words | 触发词列表 |
| tags | 标签列表 |
| source | 来源标识 |
| source_url | 来源链接(本页地址) |
| exported_at | 导出时间(每次下载生成) |
| system_prompt | 系统提示词正文 |
| model_config | 模型参数:provider / model / temperature / max_tokens / top_p |
| examples | 示例 |
| install_guide | 各平台导入说明(Coze / Dify / Claude / 自定义框架) |