owasp-security
Comprehensive OWASP-aligned security guidance across six standards - Top 10 (2021) for web apps, ASVS 5.0, MASVS v2.1.0 for mobile, API Security Top 10 (2023), Kubernetes Top 10 (2022), and the Agentic Applications 2026 edition for AI/LLM. Use for security reviews, vulnerability audits, secure auth/crypto/access-control implementation, Kubernetes manifest hardening, and LLM/agent prompt-injection defense - including indirect requests like "is this login flow secure?", "review this endpoint", or "audit my pod spec".
DeepseekModel
官方收录技能
质量 优秀 · 90
v1.0.0
获取
https://deepseekmodel.com/api/download.php?id=davila7-claude-code-templates-claude-plugin-skills-owasp-security-skill-md&format=skill
下载 .skill
标准格式,含 system_prompt 与 model_config,导入任意 Agent 框架即可使用
.skill 文件中 system_prompt 字段的实际内容。
name owasp-security description Comprehensive OWASP-aligned security guidance across six standards - Top 10 (2021) for web apps, ASVS 5.0, MASVS v2.1.0 for mobile, API Security Top 10 (2023), Kubernetes Top 10 (2022), and the Agentic Applications 2026 edition for AI/LLM. Use for security reviews, vulnerability audits, secure auth/crypto/access-control implementation, Kubernetes manifest hardening, and LLM/agent prompt-injection defense - including indirect requests like "is this login flow secure?", "review this endpoint", or "audit my pod spec". Comprehensive OWASP Security Skills A developer-focused security reference covering six OWASP standards for securing web applications, APIs, mobile apps, containers, and AI/LLM systems. Each section provides concise detection guidance, key requirements, and mitigation strategies. Quick Navigation OWASP Top 10 (2021) OWASP ASVS 5.0 OWASP MASVS v2.1.0 OWASP API Security Top 10 OWASP Kubernetes Top 10 OWASP Agentic Applications 2026 Section 1: OWASP Top 10 (2021) The OWASP Top 10 represents the most critical security risks in web applications. A01: Broken Access Control Detection: URLs with direct ID references ( /user/1234/orders ); client-side only enforcement; missing authorization checks. Mitigation: Enforce server-side authorization for every sensitive operation; verify user ownership of resources; implement default-deny principle. Example: // INSECURE: No authorization check app. get ( '/users/:id/orders' , ( req, res ) => { const orders = db. query ( 'SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?' , req. params . id ); res. json (orders); }); // SECURE: Authorization check app. get ( '/users/:id/orders' , ( req, res ) => { if (req. user . id !== parseInt (req. params . id )) return res. status ( 403 ). json ({ error : 'Forbidden' }); const orders = db. query ( 'SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?' , req. params . id ); res. json (orders); }); Checklist: ☐ Authorization on server for all sensitive ops ☐ Default-deny policy ☐ No ID-based obscurity ☐ Whitelist allowed fields A02: Cryptographic Failures Detection: Sensitive data in plaintext; weak encryption (DES, ECB); missing TLS; hardcoded secrets in code. Mitigation: Always use HTTPS/TLS; encrypt data at rest with AES-256; store secrets in environment variables or vaults; mask sensitive logs. Example: # INSECURE: API key in code api_key = "sk-abc123xyz789" # SECURE: From environment import os api_key = os.getenv( "API_KEY" ) if not api_key: raise ValueError( "API_KEY not set" ) Checklist: ☐ HTTPS enforced ☐ AES-256 encryption at rest ☐ No secrets in code ☐ Sensitive data masked in logs A03: Injection (SQL, Command, NoSQL) Detection: String concatenation in queries; exec , query , run with user input; no prepared statements. Mitigation: Use parameterized queries; whitelist input; avoid string concatenation; use safe APIs (subprocess.run with list args). Example: # INSECURE: String concatenation os.system( "tar -czf " + filename + " /var/data" ) # SECURE: List-based API import subprocess subprocess.run([ "tar" , "-czf" , filename, "/var/data" ], check= True ) Checklist: ☐ Parameterized queries only ☐ No string concat ☐ Whitelist input ☐ Safe subprocess calls A04: Insecure Design Detection: No threat modeling; missing security controls by design; no authentication/authorization from the start. Mitigation: Implement threat modeling early; design security in from the beginning; use established security libraries/patterns. Checklist: ☐ Threat modeling completed ☐ Security controls in design ☐ Auth/authz from start ☐ Security review in SDLC A05: Security Misconfiguration Detection: Debug mode enabled; default credentials; verbose error messages; missing security headers; exposed APIs. Mitigation: Disable debug mode; change defaults; hide version info; implement security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options). Example: # INSECURE: Debug enabled in production app.debug = True # SECURE: Debug disabled app.debug = False app.config[ 'HSTS_MAX_AGE' ] = 31536000 Checklist: ☐ Debug disabled ☐ Defaults changed ☐ Security headers set ☐ No version disclosure A06: Vulnerable & Outdated Components Detection: Old versions in package.json/requirements.txt; unpatched frameworks; deprecated libraries. Mitigation: Regularly audit dependencies with npm audit , pip safety , Snyk ; remove unused packages; keep frameworks patched. Checklist: ☐ Dependency audits regular ☐ No outdated versions ☐ Unused deps removed ☐ CI/CD security scanning A07: Authentication Failures Detection: Weak passwords; no MFA; predictable session IDs; weak password reset tokens; no rate limiting on login. Mitigation: Hash passwords (bcrypt/Argon2); implement MFA; generate cryptographically secure session IDs; rate-limit failed attempts. Checklist: ☐ Strong password hashing ☐ MFA available ☐ Secure session IDs ☐ Rate limiting on login A08: Software/Data Integrity Failures Detection: Unsigned updates; unverified dependencies; unsafe deserialization (pickle, Java ObjectInputStream). Mitigation: Sign and verify all updates; use JSON instead of native serialization; whitelist allowed classes; verify checksums. Checklist: ☐ Updates signed/verified ☐ JSON used for serialization ☐ No unsafe deserialization ☐ Checksums verified A09: Logging & Monitoring Failures Detection: No security event logging; logs contain secrets; no centralized logging; no alerts for anomalies. Mitigation: Log authentication events, access denials, config changes; centralize logs; implement alerts for suspicious patterns. Checklist: ☐ Security events logged ☐ No secrets in logs ☐ Logs centralized ☐ Alerts for anomalies A10: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Detection: App fetches URLs from user input; no URI validation; internal IP ranges accessible. Mitigation: Validate/sanitize URLs; whitelist domains; block internal IP ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.1); use allowlists. Checklist: ☐ URLs validated ☐ Domains whitelisted ☐ Internal IPs blocked ☐ Protocols restricted Section 2: OWASP ASVS 5.0 (Application Security Verification Standard) ASVS defines security requirements across three verification levels (L1: Basic, L2: Standard, L3: Advanced). Authentication Requirements Level Key Requirements L1 Password policies (≥8 chars) over HTTPS; brute force protection; identity verification L2 Strong hashing (bcrypt/Argon2); MFA for sensitive ops; rate-limited login; account lockout L3 Adaptive authentication; hardware-backed cryptography; step-up auth; comprehensive audit logging Access Control Requirements Level Key Requirements L1 Access control policies enforced; default deny principle; roles/permissions documented L2 Granular object/property-level controls; privilege escalation detection; token validation per request L3 Policy/attribute-based access control; cryptographic verification; real-time enforcement; full audit trails Cryptography Requirements Level Key Requirements L1 AES-256 at rest; TLS 1.2+; authenticated encryption mode (GCM/CBC); secure key storage L2 Key rotation schedule; industry-standard crypto libraries; cryptographically secure RNG; proper KDF L3 HSM integration; cryptographic agility; perfect forward secrecy; key escrow/recovery Input Validation & Encoding Level Key Requirements L1 Whitelist validation; server-side validation only; proper output encoding; SQL injection protection L2 Parameterized queries; type/length validation; context-aware encoding; XSS protection L3 Semantic validation; XXE/XML bomb protection; comprehensive injection defense; cryptographic verification Session Management Level Key Requirements L1 Random session IDs (≥128 bits); HTTP-only/secure flags; session expiration; logout invalidation L2 Token regeneration post-auth; concurrent session limits; encrypted server-side storage; idle/absolute timeouts L3 Cryptographic token binding; session fixation protection; anomaly monitoring; tamper detection Section 3: OWASP MASVS v2.1.0 (Mobile Security) Mobile applications require specialized security attention due to unique threat models: device-specific vulnerabilities, platform differences (iOS vs Android), and user data sensitivity. What it is: MASVS defines 8 control groups with L1/L2/L3 verification levels for mobile app security. When to use: Any iOS or Android app security review, secure storage implementation, biometric authentication, network communication hardening. Core Control Groups STORAGE — Protecting Sensitive Data at Rest L1 Requirements: Sensitive credentials never stored in plaintext Exclude sensitive data from backups Use platform credential storage APIs iOS Implementation (Secure): import Security func storePassword ( account : String , password : String ) { let passwordData = password.data(using: .utf8) ! let query: [ String : Any ] = [ kSecClass as String : kSecClassGenericPassword, kSecAttrAccount as String : account, kSecValueData as String : passwordData, kSecAttrAccessible as String : kSecAttrAccessibleWhenUnlockedThisDeviceOnly ] SecItemAdd (query as CFDictionary , nil ) } Android Implementation (Secure): import androidx.security.crypto.EncryptedSharedPreferences import androidx.security.crypto.MasterKeys val masterKey = MasterKeys.getOrCreate(MasterKeys.AES256_GCM_SPEC) val encryptedSharedPreferences = EncryptedSharedPreferences.create( "secret_shared_prefs" , masterKey, context, EncryptedSharedPreferences.PrefKeyEncryptionScheme.AES256_SIV, EncryptedSharedPreferences.PrefValueEncryptionScheme.AES256_GCM ) encryptedSharedPreferences.edit().putString( "api_key" , "secret" ).apply() CRYPTO — Cryptographic Standards L1 Requirements: No hardcoded keys, AES-256 for encryption, SHA-256 for hashing L2 Requirements: Secure key storage, proper key derivation (PBKDF2), authenticated encryption (GCM mode) L3 Requirements: HSM integration, key rotation, cryptographic agility AUTH — Authentication & Biometric Security Secure Biometric Implementation (iOS): import LocalAuthentication func authenticateWithBiometric () { let context = LAContext () let reason = "Authenticate to access sensitive data" context.evaluatePolicy(.deviceOwnerAuthenticationWithBiometrics, localizedReason: reason) { success, error in if success { // Re-authenticate for critical operations KeychainManager .retrieveToken() } } } NETWORK — TLS & Certificate Pinning L1 Requirements: TLS 1.2+ for all communications L2 Requirements: Certificate pinning implementation L3 Requirements: Mutual TLS (mTLS) support Android Network Security Config (Secure Pinning): <!-- res/xml/network_security_config.xml --> < network-security-config > < domain-config cleartextTrafficPermitted = "false" > < domain includeSubdomains = "true" > api.example.com </ domain > < pin-set > < pin digest = "SHA-256" > +MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEF... </ pin > </ pin-set > </ domain-config > </ network-security-config > PLATFORM — OS Integration & WebView Security L1 Requirements: Validate deep links, secure IPC, WebView hardening L2 Requirements: Intent filter verification (Android), Universal Links (iOS) L3 Requirements: Sensitive intent filters protected, WebView with JavaScript disabled unless functionally required CODE — Vulnerable Dependencies & Version Management L1 Requirements: Target latest SDK (Android 34+, iOS 15+), scan dependencies L2 Requirements: No hardcoded secrets, OTA update verification L3 Requirements: Code obfuscation (R8/ProGuard on Android, LinkMap on iOS) RESILIENCE — Jailbreak/Root Detection L1 Requirements: Detect modified environment L2 Requirements: Block execution on compromised devices L3 Requirements: Continuous monitoring, graceful degradation Android Root Detection (Secure): fun isDeviceCompromised () : Boolean { // Check for Magisk if (File( "/data/adb/magisk" ).exists()) return true // Check for SuperUser val suPath = ProcessBuilder( "which" , "su" ).start() return suPath.waitFor() == 0 } PRIVACY — Data Minimization & Privacy Disclosures L1 Requirements: Minimal PII collection, privacy policy required L2 Requirements: Permission rationale, user consent for data sharing L3 Requirements: Privacy by design, differential privacy techniques Section 4: OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) — Detailed REST and GraphQL APIs have unique security challenges different from traditional web apps. What it is: 10 critical risks specific to API design, authentication, and data exposure. When to use: Building or securing REST/GraphQL APIs, token-based authentication, rate limiting, property-level authorization. Common API Risks with Examples API1: Broken Object-Level Authorization (BOLA) Detection: Incrementing or predictable IDs in API calls allow access to other users' objects. Vulnerable Example: // GET /api/orders/123 // Returns all details of order 123, even if user_id != authenticated user app. get ( '/api/orders/:id' , ( req, res ) => { const order = db. query ( 'SELECT * FROM orders WHERE id = ?' , req. params . id ); res. json (order); // No authorization check!
Agent 识别该技能的关键词,点击任意一个即可复制。
该技能未提供触发词。
下载的 .skill 包内含以下字段。
| 字段 | 说明 |
|---|---|
| format | 格式标识(skill/v1) |
| skill_id | 技能唯一 ID |
| name | 技能名称 |
| version | 版本号 |
| description | 技能描述 |
| category | 所属分类(数组) |
| trigger_words | 触发词列表 |
| tags | 标签列表 |
| source | 来源标识 |
| source_url | 来源链接(本页地址) |
| exported_at | 导出时间(每次下载生成) |
| system_prompt | 系统提示词正文 |
| model_config | 模型参数:provider / model / temperature / max_tokens / top_p |
| examples | 示例 |
| install_guide | 各平台导入说明(Coze / Dify / Claude / 自定义框架) |