ux-audit

name ux-audit description Walk through a live web app AS a real user to find usability + behavioural bugs that static reviews miss. REQUIRES proof of interaction (typing, clicking, sending, observing) before any verdict — a sweep that didn't interact terminates with verdict 'Incomplete'. Walks threads, exercises every element, runs the multi-pane stress matrix, visual polish sweep, component perfection checklist, automated a11y (axe-core), pragmatic performance budget (LCP/CLS/INP), scenario battery (11 scenarios), and stress recipes including the real-flavour data battery. Hard gates: console errors/warnings = 0, network 5xx = 0, layout collapse = 0, axe Critical/Serious = 0, perf budget green. Audit-the-audit meta-check rejects rushed reports. Each finding has reproduction steps, evidence path, and suspected code location. Trigger with 'ux audit', 'walkthrough', 'qa sweep', 'audit the app', 'dogfood this', 'check all pages', 'find what's broken', 'stress the UI'. compatibility claude-code-only UX Audit Walk through a live web app AS a real user. The audit is interaction-first — typing, clicking, sending, watching, screenshotting. A static DOM sweep cannot produce a verdict. Verdict states The audit ends in exactly one of: Pass — Critical = 0, High = 0, all hard gates green, Interaction Manifest complete. Conditional Pass — Critical = 0, High = 0, all hard gates green, but Medium/Low present. Fail — at least one Critical or High finding, OR a hard gate red. Incomplete — Interaction Manifest missing required entries, a phase wasn't run, OR the audit-the-audit meta-check fires (manifest timestamps clustered < 0.5s apart, screenshots fewer than 2 × routes, console reads fewer than 1 × routes, Phase 3 took < 1m for an exhaustive audit). Not legal to upgrade to Pass even if everything observed looked fine. If the work doesn't include a complete Interaction Manifest, the only legal verdict is Incomplete . "It looked OK" is not Pass. A clean Pass with implausible timings is rejected — the agent must redo the audit with real interaction. Hard gates These auto-fail the audit. They cannot be downgraded. Gate Threshold Severity if violated Console errors during walkthrough > 0 Critical Console warnings during walkthrough > 0 High Network 5xx > 0 Critical Network 403 / 404 on authenticated pages > 0 High Layout collapse at any tested viewport / pane combo > 0 High axe-core Critical violations on any audited page > 0 Critical axe-core Serious violations on any audited page > 0 High LCP on representative route (pragmatic budget) > 4.0s High CLS on representative route > 0.25 High INP on representative route > 500ms High Required Interaction Manifest entry missing n/a Incomplete Manifest median gap between entries < 0.5s n/a Incomplete (didn't actually interact) A console warning is High minimum . A 5xx is Critical automatically . There is no "Medium console error" — that category does not exist in this skill. axe-core thresholds are run per page (>1 violation on any single page fails). Performance thresholds are run once on a representative route (per-page is overkill); pragmatic budget is well above broken, well below CWV-strict. Full thresholds + rationale in references/performance-budget.md . Full a11y wiring + severity mapping in references/a11y-automation.md . Allowlist for known noise Some apps have known-noisy console / network categories that aren't bugs (Sentry info logs, browser-extension chatter, expected 401 on auth-check probes). Read the audit-config file before Phase 3 and apply its allowlist. Path fallback: .jez/audit-config.yml → audit-config.yml → .audit/config.yml . Allowlisted entries stay in the Interaction Manifest but suppress from findings. Verdict block shows both raw and allowlisted: Console warnings: 3 (1 allowlisted, 2 reportable) . Default without a config: every console error / warning is a finding. Format, semantics, surface overrides in references/audit-config.md . Phases (in order) Pre-flight — Persona Lock, browser tool, URL, viewport, capability tests Discovery — sitemap, thread inventory, element inventory Walkthrough — Interaction Manifest, threads, element exhaustion, multi-pane stress, first-time-user lens, live interaction smoke Polish — visual polish sweep, component perfection checklist Stress — scenario battery (11 scenarios) + extended stress recipes Verdict — verdict state, hard-gate scorecard, perfection roadmap, findings with reproduction Fix-and-verify — patch findings, re-walk affected slices, update report For a 30-second pre-deploy check, use the dogfood drill at the bottom of this file — a project-level rule, not a skill invocation. Phase 1 — Pre-flight Five gates. Stop if any fail. 1. Persona Lock The audit needs a persona before anything else. Without a locked persona, findings drift toward generic "looks fine". Source the persona in this order: Argument — if the user provided one ("ux audit as a busy insurance broker") Project personas — read existing persona files (fallback chain: .jez/audit-personas/<slug>.md → docs/personas/<slug>.md → personas/<slug>.md → .audit/personas/<slug>.md ). The first match wins. Ask once — "Who uses this app and what are they trying to get done?" Capture: role, tech comfort, time pressure, emotional state, device context. A good persona predicts what they'd miss ("A receptionist between phone calls won't scroll below the fold"). Lock the persona by writing the chosen persona at the top of the audit report. Every finding must be defensible from this persona's perspective. If you catch yourself thinking "a developer would know..." — stop. Your persona doesn't. Always also run the first-time-user lens (mandatory, see Phase 3) on every multi-page feature, even when the explicit persona is something else. It's the single biggest blind spot for AI / internal tooling. See references/persona-lock.md for the persona library and writing protocol. 2. Browser tool Target Tool Why Authenticated app Chrome MCP Uses your real logged-in Chrome session — OAuth, cookies, RBAC just work Public site Playwright MCP No login needed Neither available Stop Ask the user to connect Chrome MCP or install Playwright Do not silently fall back to a fresh Playwright session for an authenticated app — the audit is worthless if you can't log in. If Chrome MCP isn't connected, stop and say: "Open Chrome, click Connect in the Claude extension, then rerun." See references/browser-tools.md for commands. 3. URL Prefer the deployed/live version — real auth, real latency, real CDN and CORS. Discovery: read project CLAUDE.md / README for "URL" → check stack config ( wrangler.jsonc , vite.config.ts , next.config.js , config/database.yml , manage.py , .env APP_URL , wp-config.php ) → lsof -i :PORT (common: 5173 Vite, 3000 Next/Rails, 8000 Django/Laravel, 8787 Wrangler, 4321 Astro) → ask. Stack-specific guide in references/project-adaptation.md . Use local only if the user asks or the feature isn't deployed. 4. Viewport Pin the window at 1440×900 to start. Phase 3 multi-pane stress tests 375 / 768 / 1024 / 1280 / 1440 / 1920. Do not go above 2000px — it breaks the harness. 5. Capability tests Before any walkthrough, prove the tools work — one call each: One screenshot One console read One network request inventory One element selector query If any fail, stop and fix the connection before starting the audit. An audit blind to console output is worthless. Phase 2 — Discovery Sitemap crawl Build the complete page inventory before auditing any page. Router config — read the app's route definitions (React Router, TanStack Router, Next.js app dir) Nav crawl — click through every section and sub-section of the sidebar/menu Deep links — URLs in CLAUDE.md, docs, or a prior audit report One line per route, with purpose: /app/clients — list of clients, search, add new . Thread inventory Identify 3–5 real tasks that make up a user's day. These are the spines of the audit. How to find them: ask the user, read CLAUDE.md / README, infer from top-level nav. Examples: insurance broker → renew a policy, create a client, work today's queue. Project management → morning triage, update a task, send a client summary. Spaces / chat app → create a space, send a message, open a thread. Element inventory For each route as you reach it, list every interactive element. Build inventories lazily — per-page as you traverse, not all up-front. This drives the coverage metric: "tested 29 of 31 elements on /app/clients" . Phase 3 — Walkthrough (the audit itself) Interaction Manifest (MANDATORY) Every walkthrough produces a manifest. Without it, verdict = Incomplete. INTERACTION MANIFEST — /dashboard/spaces/marketing-pod Persona: SME owner, time-pressed, low tech comfort [✓] 14:32:01 Typed "@assistant test" into message input (textarea[placeholder*="message"]) [✓] 14:32:03 Picked @assistant from autocomplete (li[data-mention-id="assistant"]) [✓] 14:32:05 Clicked Send (button[aria-label="Send"]) [✓] 14:32:06 Verified input cleared within 1000ms (textarea.value === "") [✓] 14:32:08 Verified message appeared in transcript ([data-message-id] count +1) [✓] 14:32:12 Opened thread on the message ([data-thread-trigger]) [✓] 14:32:13 Verified main column width ≥ 200px after thread open (getBoundingClientRect().width) [✓] Console read after each step (0 warnings, 0 errors) [✓] Screenshot before + after each step [✓] Network requests inventoried (0 5xx, 0 403/404 on auth pages) Every checkbox needs a tool call (a click, a screenshot, a console read) and the timestamps + selectors are logged. The agent cannot produce a "Pass" report without a complete manifest. Required entries per page audited : ≥ 1 input typed into (real text, not just clicked) ≥ 1 primary action triggered (Send / Save / Submit / Create / Publish — whichever fits) ≥ 1 modal or detail pane opened ≥ 1 console read after the primary action ≥ 1 screenshot before AND after the primary action Verification of expected post-action state (input cleared, success toast, route change, list updated) Full template + replay protocol in references/interaction-manifest.md . Thread Traversal For each thread: Start from the app entry point — not mid-thread. Real users land at / or /dashboard . Walk as the persona — if they'd skim, skim. If they'd misread a label, misread it. Note hesitations. Screenshot every state change — default → hover/focus → active → after click → after load → confirmation. The filmstrip is the evidence. Track the cost — click count, decision points, dead ends, interrupt recovery (close tab at step 3, return at step 4 — did state survive?) Hand screenshots to a sub-agent for review at the end of each thread. At the end of each thread, answer (as the persona): Did it end clearly? Would I come back? One thing to make this twice as easy? See references/walkthrough-checklist.md and references/workflow-comprehension.md . Element Exhaustion For each route, work the inventory. Skip elements already exercised by thread traversal. Detail in references/walkthrough-checklist.md . For every list/table , test at volumes 0 / 1 / 100 / 1000+ if data permits. Multi-Pane Stress (mandatory for apps with collapsible UI) Pane combinations hide the worst layout bugs — the 2026-04-29 vertical-text-in-spaces bug only manifested at 1024-1280px with all three panes open. For apps with sidebars / members / threads / drawers / sheets, run the matrix: 1920 / 1440 / 1280 (high-bug) / 1024 (catastrophic-bug) / 768 / 375 × all-open, 2-pane, 1-pane, default. For each combination: scroll the longest content, capture a screenshot, run layout-detection JS for overflow / clipping / vertical-text-stacks. Full matrix + JS snippets + automation in references/multi-pane-stress.md . First-time-user lens (mandatory) Beyond the locked persona, every multi-page feature must pass the first-time user check. This catches the single biggest UX failure mode in internal/AI tooling: features built by the people who designed them work for them , but a brand-new user landing on the same screen has no idea what any of the controls mean. Adopt the persona of someone signing in to this app for the very first time, with no prior context, no source access, no internal documentation . For each screen ask: Question What it catches Could I complete the task without reading the code or docs? Hidden technical knowledge baked into the form Are field labels in plain language, not internal vocabulary? agentClass , slug , webhook_id leaking into UI Do dropdowns / pickers show what each option does , not just an ID? Snake_case enums, raw class names, opaque slugs Are defaults sensible enough to keep them and move on? Required fields with no defaults, mandatory ID inputs Is there a discoverable list of valid values when something needs to be entered? Free-text inputs where a combobox should be If I'd say "click Skip" because I don't understand a setting, that's a UX bug. Optional-but-confusing settings exposed as primary inputs When the lens fires, log a finding even if the screen technically works. Common fixes: replace text inputs with pickers, surface metadata, auto-derive values, hide internal IDs under "Advanced", add inline guidance. A screen passes the lens when a brand-new persona could complete the task without back-channel help. Live Interaction Smoke Code reading verifies a button exists and has an onClick . It does not verify clicking actually does something observable. For every interactive control on every page: Click it. Pointer moves, element highlights, click lands. Watch the Network tab. Did a request fire? To the right URL? Correct method + body? Watch the DOM. Did something visibly change — new element, removed element, state transition? If nothing changed in (2) or (3), that's a bug. Known silent-failure controls (Approve/Deny on tool-call cards, OAuth-in-dialog popup-blocked, async-validation forms, optimistic-UI delete, off-by-one pagination, filter chips with stale TanStack Query, Reply/Forward without Message-ID): see references/live-interaction-smoke.md for the full silent-failure catalogue and SDK contract checks ( @ai-sdk/react , better-auth, TanStack Query, React Router v7, Radix Dialog, zodResolver). Round-trip Workflow Integrity (mandatory) Covered by Scenario 10 in the battery (Phase 5). Run it as part of Phase 3 walkthrough too — every A→B→A flow encountered while traversing threads gets the round-trip check before moving on. Full protocol in references/round-trip-workflows.md . Responsive Sweep Layout-detection JS at every width (overflow, clipping, invisible text). Capture transition points. Combined with multi-pane stress above for full coverage. Auth-expired mid-audit If a navigation or API call returns 401/403 on a previously-authenticated route, the session dropped. Don't silently re-auth — every subsequent observation is corrupted. Stop, capture the breaking step (silent expiry is itself a finding), terminate with verdict Incomplete , recommend re-auth + restart. Full protocol + finding criteria in references/auth-expired-handling.md . Phase 4 — Polish Visual Polish Sweep A page-by-page micro-polish pass covering ten AI-tell categories: optical centring, nested border-radius rule, off-scale spacing, vibe greys, border-weight drift, drop-shadow direction, animation timings off canonical, hover-delta calibration, underline / uppercase letter-spacing, symmetry vs editorial pacing. Plus a per-component optical pass for buttons, badges, inputs, dropdowns, cards, tabs, avatars, toasts. Full protocol with DevTools workflow, severity guide, and reference apps for calibration in references/visual-polish.md . Component Perfection Checklist Component-level granularity that page-level audits miss. Six categories, each with concrete yes/no checks that need proof artefacts: Buttons & Triggers — state clarity, intent matching, micro-copy, loading state, hierarchy Inputs & Forms — persistent labels, masks, inline validation, error clarity, defaulting Navigation & Hierarchy — Where am I?, click depth, search logic, sticky headers Visual Coherence — icon consistency, empty states, border radii, contrast ratio Mobile & Touch — tappable surface (≥ 48×48), keyboard optimisation, swipe gestures Performance & Feedback — skeleton screens, success toasts, confirmation modals only for high-stakes Plus six visual states per major component (default, skeleton, empty, partial, error, disabled) — skeleton-on-blank is not a skeleton. Each checkbox in the report cites a proof artefact (screenshot, console line, DOM selector, code reference). No proof = doesn't count. Full checklist in references/perfection-checklist.md . Automated accessibility (axe-core, mandatory) Manual keyboard-only walks (Scenario 5) catch focus traps and tab-order. They miss ~80% of structural a11y bugs (heading skips, hover/focus contrast failures, missing aria-labels, role mismatches). axe-core covers that 80% in <1 second per page. For every audited page: Inject axe-core via CDN (one script tag). Run axe.run() after the page settles. Map violations → audit findings (axe critical → audit Critical, axe serious → audit High, etc). Hard-gate: > 0 axe Critical OR > 0 axe Serious on any page = audit Fails. Total runtime for a 16-route audit is ~16 seconds. Allowlist via the project's audit-config (path fallback chain in references/audit-config.md ) for builder-mode reference pages (Components, Style guide). Full snippet, severity mapping, and findings format in references/a11y-automation.md . Performance budget (pragmatic, mandatory) Run the Performance API capture once on a representative route (the page real users hit most — usually dashboard or main work surface). Pragmatic thresholds (LCP < 4.0s, CLS < 0.25, INP < 500ms) sit well above broken and well below Google's CWV "Good" tier. CWV-strict is for landing pages and marketing teams; for app interiors that real users sit inside, pragmatic is the right bar. Add to verdict block. Hard-gate any threshold breach. Diagnose with Chrome DevTools Performance trace (large hero, late font, heavy click handler, hydration cost). Full measurement snippet, throttling spec, and common offenders in references/performance-budget.md . Phase 5 — Stress Scenario Battery (11 scenarios)