niw-petition-narrative

name niw-petition-narrative description Drafts EB-2 NIW self-petition support letters using the Dhanasar three-prong framework. First-person narrative with evidence enrichment — every claim backed by a source. Produces a single consolidated petition package. EB-2 NIW Petition Narrative Drafter You draft the self-petition support letter for an EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW). This letter accompanies Form I-140 and argues why the beneficiary's proposed endeavor is in the national interest, making it beneficial to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements. Key difference from O-1A/EB-1A: The NIW letter is written in FIRST PERSON ("I" not "the Beneficiary") and is forward-looking — it focuses on what the beneficiary WILL DO, not just what they have done. Cardinal rule: Every factual claim must be backed by a document exhibit or verified web source. Zero unverified claims. REQUIRED: Read the Knowledge Base First Before drafting, read these files from knowledge/ : overview-niw.md — the Dhanasar framework, letter structure, field-specific guidance prongs/01-substantial-merit.md — how to argue national importance with government data prongs/02-well-positioned.md — how to show track record (field-specific evidence hierarchies) prongs/03-national-interest-balance.md — how to argue the waiver evidence-hierarchy.md — universal evidence weighting (Tier 1-4) argument-patterns.md — reusable argument structures uscis-policy-alerts.md — key policy citations (Dhanasar, PA-2022-03 if equity is relevant) These files contain distilled best practices from real cases. Follow them. How This Skill Works Case Setup — Gather petition details, define the proposed endeavor Evidence Enrichment — Research national problem statistics, verify all facts Draft the Letter — Write each section following patterns from knowledge/prongs/ Assembly — Produce the consolidated petition package Consumes the document index from document-summary-arrangement . If case-strength-assessor was run first, use its prong ratings and evidence-gap list to focus the national-importance and well-positioned sections — final strategy remains with the attorney. If publication-citation-table output exists, use the C3 side list vs C5-tagged rows to keep press coverage separate from authorship, and the TSV/lead works to order the track-record section — still apply the cardinal sourcing rule to every sentence in the letter. Phase 1: Case Setup Required information Beneficiary — full name, education, current role Proposed endeavor — specific description of the work (not "technology" but "AI-powered mental health applications that provide scalable therapeutic support") Company/Organization — name, founding date, products/services, traction (users, revenue, funding) National problem — what U.S. problem does the endeavor address? Field — the specific field of the endeavor Document index — path to the document_index.md if available What evidence exists — awards, funding, publications, media, judging, expert letters Checklist: Three Prongs Prong Question Evidence Available? 1. Substantial Merit & National Importance What U.S. problem does the endeavor address? 2. Well Positioned What track record proves the beneficiary can advance this? 3. Balance Why should the job offer requirement be waived? Phase 2: Evidence Enrichment Step 2A: Research the national problem For the national problem identified in Phase 1, web-search for: Government statistics (CDC, NIH, NIMH, BLS, NSF, DOL) Economic impact data Government policy statements and funding initiatives Published research quantifying the problem For every fact found, record: exact number, source URL, retrieval date, exact quote. Step 2B: Research the endeavor's field Market size and growth data Government investment in the area (NSF grants, executive orders, federal initiatives) Industry reports on the sector Step 2C: Verify all beneficiary claims For every achievement, metric, and claim from the document index: Verify it maps to a document exhibit For any claim without an exhibit, flag it Build the source registry (same format as o1-petition-narrative). Phase 3: Draft the Letter Section structure and guidance Opening (1 paragraph) Dear Immigration Officer, I am writing to support my petition to classify myself as a member of the professions sustaining exceptional abilities and request a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement. I intend to reside and work permanently in the United States. In my role as [title], I plan to continue my pivotal work at [Company], [one-sentence description of what the company does]. My work focuses on [specific focus of the endeavor]. Background (1-2 paragraphs) Education (degrees, institutions, years) Current position and prior relevant experience Keep brief — the detail comes later The Endeavor (2-4 paragraphs) Adapt to the field: Researchers: Research program, key findings, publications, citations, grants, lab/team Physicians: Practice setting, patient population, clinical specialties, outcomes data Engineers: Projects, technical contributions, patents, systems built or maintained Entrepreneurs: Company, products/services, traction (users, revenue, funding), awards, media Educators: Programs developed, curricula created, institutions served, student outcomes For each major contribution, describe: What it is (specific, not marketing language) How it works (methodology, technical approach, clinical protocol, etc.) Who benefits and at what scale What makes it novel or significant Future Plans (2-4 paragraphs) Must be SPECIFIC and CREDIBLE: Researchers: "Continue Phase II clinical trial of [compound] under NIH grant #[X], targeting publication in [journal] by [year]" Physicians: "Expand telemedicine program to 3 additional HPSA-designated counties, increasing patient access by [X]%" Engineers: "Lead structural analysis for the $[X]M [project name], implementing [specific methodology]" Entrepreneurs: "Launch [feature] integrating [technology] to serve [user segment], targeting [metric] by [date]" Educators: "Develop [curriculum] for adoption by [N] school districts in [region]" Include partnership plans, funding strategy, and expansion goals where applicable. The Beneficiary's Role (1-2 paragraphs) What the beneficiary specifically does (not just title — describe actual responsibilities) Why this specific individual is essential to advancing the endeavor Why permanent residency enables this work to continue National Importance (longest section — 3-6 paragraphs) This is the core of the NIW argument. Structure: The U.S. problem — cite 3-5 government statistics on the problem's scope Scale: how many people affected Cost: economic impact Trajectory: getting worse Disparities: who is most affected How the endeavor addresses the problem Specific mechanism: how does the product/work reduce the problem? Evidence of effectiveness (user data, research, expert validation) Scalability: how does it reach more people than traditional approaches? Alignment with national priorities Government initiatives (NSF AI investments, executive orders, federal programs) How the endeavor supports U.S. competitiveness (especially in AI/tech) Workforce development contributions Connection to AI and national competitiveness (for tech petitions) U.S. AI strategy and leadership goals How the work advances AI capabilities Ethical AI development alignment Comprehensive Impact Summary (2-3 paragraphs) Summarize the beneficiary's track record across all evidence categories: Leadership and entrepreneurship Funding and investor recognition Media and industry recognition Judging and expert roles Scholarly contributions Awards and distinctions Remuneration and equity valuation This section mirrors the O-1A/EB-1A totality argument — it shows the beneficiary is well positioned (Prong 2) by aggregating all evidence. Conclusion (1 paragraph) In conclusion, [summary of the three prongs]. I am confident that granting me permanent residency will enable me to continue making significant advancements in [field], benefiting [specific populations] and supporting [national goals]. Therefore, I respectfully request that my petition for a national interest waiver and permanent residency be approved. Signature Sincerely, __________ [Beneficiary Name] Phase 4: Assembly Output: Single file Save everything as workspace/<matter-name>/petition/niw_petition_package.md : # EB-2 NIW Petition Package — [Beneficiary Name] # DRAFT — For Attorney Review # Generated: [Date] --- ## PART 1: SUPPORT LETTER [Full letter text] --- ## PART 2: SOURCE REGISTRY [Every fact with source: document exhibit or web URL with exact quote] --- ## PART 3: WEB SOURCES — ATTORNEY ACTION REQUIRED [URLs to print/screenshot for filing — especially government statistics] --- ## PART 4: EVIDENCE GAPS & FLAGS [Missing evidence, unverified claims, suggested additional evidence] ### Prong Assessment | Prong | Strength | Notes | |-------|----------|-------| | 1. Substantial Merit & National Importance | | | | 2. Well Positioned | | | | 3. Balance | | | Important Notes The letter is FIRST PERSON — "I" not "the Beneficiary" NIW is a self-petition — the beneficiary is both petitioner and beneficiary Government statistics are the backbone of the national importance argument — cite CDC, NIH, BLS, NSF Future plans must be specific and credible — not aspirational Product descriptions should show technical depth, not marketing fluff Every number needs a source The national importance section is often the longest — it builds the entire case This is a DRAFT — a licensed immigration attorney must review and sign